Search the List

Tuesday, March 26, 2024

Enda Walsh | The Walworth Farce / 2009

keeping to the script

by Douglas Messerli

 

Enda Walsh The Walworth Farce / Freud Playhouse, UCLA (the performance I saw was on Saturday, November 14, 2009)

 

In a dilapidated South London apartment a relocated Irishman, Dinny, is busy massaging lotion into his shaved head, while in the other room his son Blake is casually slipping into a woman's dress. Enter the second son, Sean, who has evidently been out shopping and, upon unpacking his groceries, discovers, to his great dismay, that he has been given the wrong package. We sense something is about to begin, and before we know it, the three have begun a farcical drama incorporating outlandish switches of costume, scene, situation, and even genre.


      Dinny's "play" has become for these three a ritual act, the very source of drama, wherein night after night they perform a ludicrous creation that with each performance becomes more and more "real."

     The imagined "reality" concerns a rich brain surgeon living in Cork (Dinny) whose mother has just died and soon comes to loggerheads with his older brother over the mother's will. Meanwhile, Dinny's wife cooks up a chicken in the kitchen, while the brother's wife flirts with Dinny in the living room along with another woman (of uncertain origin, the plot becoming absurdly confused at this point), all played by Blake with lines occasionally spoken to the various wigs raised into air, while Blake and Sean spring into new roles and costumes. At one point the mother seems to be involved in the plot to murder the brother so that they can inherit the money, pouring a poison sauce over the chicken while various other figures run in and out of rooms. This is after all a farce!

      The performances by Michael Glenn Murphy (Dinny), Tadhg Murphy (Sean), and Raymond Scannell (Blake) are all quite brilliant—as they should be! With a kind of reversal of ancient Greek theater, where the best playwrights were awarded, Dinny proffers a plastic trophy each evening to the best actor, usually himself.

      On the particular evening we're witnessing, however, things get in the way. As we have seen, Sean, the only one briefly allowed out of the house, has brought home the wrong food/props. Dinny and Blake soon discover that a conversation with the check-out clerk has disconcerted him. A knock on the door startles the performers, who cautiously undo the door's several locks to discover the clerk herself, a Black woman named Hayley, come to bring him the right bag. Nonplussed by the intrusion, Dinny calmly enlists her as an actor. When she insists she cannot stay, that she is only on a break from work, it suddenly becomes apparent that it was not an invitation; her role will be enforced.


    

     We now begin to perceive, as the play progresses, that the work is less a farce than a kind of lunatic murder mystery, a mad justification of a violent rampage that left the family motherless and ended in their escape from Cork to the British capital; and the implications of those murders suggest that Hayley will never be allowed to leave the house alive.

      As the other "reality" of the situation begins to dawn upon Sean, he breaks character again and again, utterly frustrating Dinny as he tries to keep to the script, reenacting his insane fabrication as smoothly as he can. Yet the comedy increasingly spirals into tragedy as Sean begins to reveal some of the truths: Dinny was a simple laborer and apparently turned violent upon the family, escaping without the children to England, the children being sent later on into their father's hands.

      The actors, now including Hayley—whose dark Black face has been crudely converted through a slathering of white lotion by Dinny into "white face"—sputter out their lines, Sean increasingly moves away from the script, until he is locked in a closet by his brother, Blake, who takes up a knife and kills his own father. As he frees Sean from his imprisonment, Sean, in turn, stabs Blake, while in the midst of this melodramatic mayhem, Hayley bolts.

     The significance of all that has happened and the inevitability of what will now happen in the "real" world is suddenly brought home to Sean. He will never be able to live out his fantasy, to travel to Bristol with his new-found friend. Putting black boot polish upon his face, he leaves the house as another being, his own identity having been lost in the performance.

     Despite the hilarity and suggestiveness of this play, however, I have some reservations about the work. As I have written elsewhere (see My Year 2002 for example), works centered in farce and based upon the camp aesthetic, as this one seems to be, often put the audience in a difficult position where they find it almost impossible to empathize or even sympathize with such extreme figures. If Walsh's plot is absurd and ludicrous, so too is the Irish family it portrays. The important thing in such works, as in Tennessee Williams' A Streetcar Named Desire, I argue, is to introduce into the story a character grounded in the real, whose relationship with the extreme figures brings them some credence and provides them some emotional perspective.

     Walsh obviously attempts to do that with the figure of Hayley, whose very "ordinariness" and acceptance of these ridiculous beings helps to humanize them. Yet Hayley's actions in The Walworth Farce consists primarily of her cowering in the kitchen, and her role is too small to lend much depth to the three adult men supposedly performing a ritual based on lies night after night. The deaths of Dinny and Boyle, accordingly, do not so much shock us as "relieve" the viewer from attending the horror show with which they have bombarded him.

      Sean's final actions ultimately seem to have less to do with finding a new self than with discovering reality, whatever that might mean, something we doubt this permanently infantile character will ever be able to accomplish.            

 

Los Angeles, November 18, 2009

Reprinted from US Theater, Opera, and Performance (August 2010).

Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz (Witkacy) | The Two-Headed Calf / 2019

a confusion of dichotomies

by Douglas Messerli

 

Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz (Witkacy) The Two-Headed Calf / a production of CalArts Center for NePerformance and studio teargaleria / performed at Redcat (Roy and Edna Disney/CalArts Theater) in Los Angeles, the performance I attended was on October 19, 2019

 

First performed in 1921, The Two-Headed Calf, by the noted Polish writer Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz (known to Poles as Witkacy), is a bizarre family drama, which originally shuffled between Papua-New Guinea and Australia as the play’s young neurotic hero, Karmazyniello,  after the suicide of his beloved fiancée, attempts to determine who and what he is and how he was born into the mad family in which he exists.

 

    As in other such avant-garde productions of the time, which were later major influences on everyone from Artaud to Ionesco and Beckett, there is little coherent plot and no clear trajectory for where the play is moving. All we can truly be sure of is that the climate—an important factor here, as it may be in all of our futures—heats up the body, inner and outer, of the protagonist until he is confused about a great many things, as is the audience, perhaps a perfect metaphor for the way most of feel much of the time today.

     This spectacular new production by Warsaw’s Teatr Studio, headed by Natalia Korczakowska, transforms the location to Sydney and the California desert, ending in Death Valley. The character is now named Patricianello (performed through two hooded personas, representing obviously the two-headed calf, by Rett Keeter and Robert Wasieciz), the name suggesting both his patriarchally-controlled world and the Italian ribald jester, clown, fool and wit that defines the puppet Punchinello.


      This 2019 version of Witkacy’s major play asks many of the same unanswerable questions of the original but in ways that seem more contemporary. Is our young hero in love with his father, suggesting an almost pedophilic attachment, with his sister, his brother, or is the entire family—since three of the major male family figures at one point appear in full white gowns—transgender?

      Except for the highly languid Lady Leocladia Clay (Ewa Blaszczyk), most of the other figures, particularly the males, seem throughout to literally bounce off one another, in a remarkably athletic representation of both their loves and hates for the people with whom they live.        

     There is also a Queen (Symone Holmes) and a beautiful blonde-haired man, which represents the best of the Parvis family, and the always suffering boy, who seems unable to determine whom he most loves or even what his sexuality might be or become. Witkacy suggests that perhaps he loves himself far more than anyone else.

      Scenic designer Salman Beydoun, along with the costume designer Marek Adamski and lighting designer Marek Adamski stir up this strange pot-au-feu with amazing visual transformations, accompanied with music by Beethoven and original compositions by Chris Kallmyer.

       In short, in this engaging production there is a lot for the ear and the eye, while the play fevers up the imagination in the viewer’s attempt to make coherent meaning of what is going on. Yet that is Witkiewicz’s real point: it is impossible to truly make linear sense of the psyche of any individual, let alone to try to explain the devastation we all suffer, to some extent, through family life. Meaning, “coming through” to whatever we mean by the “real” self, is nearly impossible, and it is only by facing the always heated-up landscape of pasts that we can comfortably move into relative stable future, perhaps simply to pass on our confusions to the next generations.

       The two-headed calf is always an abomination, even if it might be seen as a kind of wonder, for yes cannot mean yes, and no cannot mean no (for the opposite of which, at one point, a character argues) if you’ve got two minds in one. You are always of two minds, as anyone who carefully thinks will be for their entire lives. And that is the true dilemma of our handsome and plainer looking Patricianello, trapped in the confusion of dichotomies.

      

Los Angeles, October 25, 2019

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (October 2019).

Sam Shepard | Killer's Head and The Unseen Hand / 2020

 them and us

by Douglas Messerli

 

Sam Shepard Killer’s Head and The Unseen Hand / directed by Darrell Larson at The Odyssey Theatre Ensemble, the production I saw was on Sunday, January 26, 2020

 

The other day I attended two short plays by Sam Shepard at The Odyssey Theatre Ensemble in Los Angeles. The plays, Killer’s Head and The Unseen Hand represent two of the strangest plays I have seen in a long while, reminding me somewhat of the highly incompetent filmmaker Ed Wood.


      Yet we know Shepard is everything but incompetent. It’s just that these works seem both more like amalgams of ideas thrown together in a baggy mess of plot than fully conceived dramas, while nonetheless being totally fascinating.

     The longer second play is certainly the most interesting. Camped out in a 1951 Chevrolet near a highway that leads to Azusa in California’s San Gabriel Valley, is the grizzly ex-cowboy, Blue (Carl Weintraub). That town’s population at the time this play premiered was about 20,000, and for anyone who has been there even today, one might easily describe it as Gertrude Stein did Oakland: “there is no there there.”

      Blue—surviving his brothers Cisco and Sycamore, the three of them having been the peers of the Jameses and the Daltons of the previous century—has lived in the automobile apparently for years, since he is now 120, talking to himself and imagining the villains who travel Route 66, including the dangerous hot-rodders of the modern age.


    He has been alone, apparently, for so long that when suddenly a being is beamed down from Outer Space, we cannot quickly determine whether he comes from this Methuselah’s imagination or from the Nogo land which he claims. This young figure, Willie (Matt Curtin), has, he explains, escaped his planet in order to save it, spouting words, as the critic Mel Gussow described it, “like a computer headed for the repair shop.”

     Willie explains that the people of his world have an unseen hand tattooed upon their heads, which controls their actions and destinies. Making Blue younger, and calling up his two brothers from the dead, Willie hopes to return with them to Nogo land and fulminate a revolution.

      Cisco (Jordan Morgan) soon arrives, dressed in a handsome serape, that makes him almost appear to be a 1960s hippie, followed later by the more sartorially-clad, dressed all in black, Sycamore (Chris Payne Gilbert), a former train robber who is heartily saddened to hear that there are no longer any trains—at least not near Azusa, the town that describes itself as containing everything American from “A” to “Z.”

     This now Sci-fi / Western adventure story suddenly torques into yet another dimension when a young male cheerleader suddenly arrives on the scene, his sweat pants dropped to his shoes, revealing a series of rope burns branded upon his legs by sports players from Azusa high school in manner that can only remind one of the viral homophobia that killed Matt Shepard. This new figure, simply called the Kid (Andrew Morrison), spends most of the play in his skivvies, since the gun-toting Sycamore, suspecting the Kid of evil attentions and perhaps being somewhat homophobic himself, will not permit the boy literally to “pull up his pants,” keeping the Kid in near-eternal infancy. 

     Shepard, accordingly, has brought together several figures representing the past, the present, and the future, each colliding and crashing against one another with toxic notions of masculinity in order to determine whether or not there is a way to save the universe from, as Willie proclaims, “mass suicide.”

     Can we be saved from our past errors of the domination of others that Sycamore, or, when the Kid steals away the gun of his torturer, the evident stupidity of the present as the boy (a cheerleader one must remember) humorously gushes out his love of all Azusa, the school, teachers, Lion’s Club, etc. etc.—and this coming all after just his being abused by his peers—or the horrors of the future? Perhaps there was never a time, considering Trump’s presidency and the ever-encroaching dangers of climate change, in which the playwright’s work has had greater significance.

      In Shepard’s moral fable, they all find a way to temporarily work together, Sycamore allowing the Kid to pull up his pants, and, in a slight shift of relationships, Blue walking away with his more-tamed brother Cisco and the almost brain-dead Willie, while Sycamore determines to stay behind in the 1951 antique of an auto, perhaps to fight off the devils of the highway near him who have taken away his train-robbing livelihood.

 

     The first play of this duo, Killer’s Head, is only an eight-minute monologue in which a man (Steve Howey in the production I saw) sits strapped into an electric chair awaiting the bolts of power which will put him to death. Yet instead of imagining the terror he is about to embrace, he thinks forward to a continuation of the mundane life he has apparently led, despite his murder, so I gleaned, of his wife.

     His concerns are not the fear of death but visions of a new pickup truck, a career as a horse trainer, and other possibilities of life.

     Shepard’s juxtaposition of events clearly turn murder into an everyday event, while everyday dreams and actions become deeply meaningful relationships with life itself.

     Yet, here Shepard’s irony is just a little too cute and quick. We know the facts even before the play has begun. It is nearly impossible for any of us to truly imagine death. And living is filled with thousands of truly unimportant events that seem of value only because we imagine them to be.

 

Los Angeles, January 30, 2020

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (January 2020).

Magos Herrera and the Brooklyn Rider quintet | untitled concert / 2019

dreaming through music

by Douglas Messerli

 

Magos Herrera and Brooklyn Rider quintet / I attended the performance at The Wallis Annenberg Center’s Bram Goldsmith Theater, with Thérèse Bachand, on Thursday, October 10, 2019

Let me begin this review by admitting that I do not have language skills in either Spanish or Portuguese. It is important to say this when you are reviewing a concert when almost all the songs are in these languages.

 


      Last night at the Wallis’ Bram Goldsmith Theater, apparently, many of the Beverly Hills audience members felt that, given that language gap, they had to get up and politely exit the theater, while my evening companion, Bachand and I remained in our seats to soak up the lovely music of the beautiful and jazz-inspired Brooklyn Rider quintet—Johnny Grandelsman (violin), Colin Jacobsen (violin), Nicholas Cords (Viola), Michael Nicholas (cello), with Mathias Kunzli playing a wide range of percussion instruments—accompanying the wonderful vocal renderings of Magos Herrera.

     The songs she sang and the quintet played were from composers from Mexico, South America and Spain, including Chile’s Violeta Parra, Argentina’s Gustavo “Cuchi” Leguizamón and José Castilla, and Carlos Aguirre, Mexico’s Álvaro Carrillo and Magos Herrera’s own compositions—one in collaboration with Felipe Pérez and another with Nicaraguan composer Fabio Gouvea, along with a popular Mexican song, a Spanish composition based on the work of Federico García Lorca by Vicente Amigo, and several songs by the most brilliant Brazilian composers of the 20th century, whose works I have heard on my two trips to that country, Gilberto Gil, Caetano Veloso, and João Gilberto. Although I might have liked to have minimal translations provided, I think my theater companion and I truly understood their undercurrents of love and betrayal.

      But what the audience who remained truly understood is in the Octavio Paz quote, which prefaced this performance:

 

             Dream of the sun dreaming its world. Sing till the song throws 

             out root, trunk, branches, birds, stars. Sing until the dream 

             engenders the spring at which you may drink and recognize 

             yourself and recover.

 

        Based on the group's Sony Masterworks recording from this year, Dreamers, this important work refers not just to the “dreamers,” not just born in the US in fear of deportation, but on all those who might dream to be free of dictatorial governments and able to move across borders with the ease of these lovely songs. If I didn’t comprehend many of the words, I knew what they meant through Herrera’s lovely phrasings: they were all a cry to love, care for one another, to join together with a joy in just being together.


        The darker tones provided by the quintet worked brilliantly with Herrera’s soprano voice to provide us with a language that spoke of the stupidity of any walls between people. This was a music that communicates its intensity of loving, of caring, of passion that doesn’t even need a translator to communicate it to you. And I feel so sorry for those who felt excluded and left because of that. I’d only cry out: open your ears and you will hear an ocean of comprehension.

       Herrera—dressed in a gorgeous white gown, covered with a caftan with stunningly sashed green rows of ribbons, and white shell-like earrings—sings with a Latin-based soprano voice (and what a voice!) of a world open to the borders of linguistic differences. Although I might have desired to understand every word she phrased, the point was aptly made, music transforms us simply by its remarkable rhythms, its pulses, its amazing ability to pull us in by our ears and hearts.

        Those of us who remained were treated to an evening so memorable that even I as a critic, who often does not prefer to stand up for the now standard standing ovation, stood willingly up to applaud this amazing musical demonstration of borders completely collapsed. I could have almost cared less whether or not I understood what was being sung: it was simply marvelous to hear it.

 

Los Angeles, October 11, 2019

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (October 2019).

 

 

Gertrude Stein and Virgil Thomson | The Mother of Us All / 2020

 men are poor things

by Douglas Messerli

 

Gertrude Stein and Virgil Thomson (writer and composer) The Mother of Us All / performed by the Juilliard Opera, with the New York Philharmonic at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, performed on television on April 3, 2020

 

Gertrude Stein’s and Virgil Thomson’s significant 1947 opera, The Mother of Us All—performed on live-television the other night from the Charles Engelhard Court of the Metropolitan Museum of Art—was one of the great events of 2020, and a particularly needed tonic in these difficult times of the COVID-19 pandemic.


      Yet, Thomson’s score, buried as it was, as The New York Times critic Zachery Wolfe put it, “far-off under the Branch Bank facade, sounded less snappy than they should.” Stein’s lyrics, however, sung vitally by soprano Felica Moore, did come alive, and were the center of this work.

      Fortunately, Stein’s pastiche of language grows even stronger in this production. This is not only a work about the great ur-feminist Anthony, who helped women get the opportunity to vote, but is a story about all those, past and present, who were disenfranchised, women, blacks, the poor, and just those hadn’t the opportunity of expressing themselves in the democratic process, as well as people who helped that governance to come into being, such as Daniel Webster, John Quincy Adams, and even Lillian Russell.


     Anthony, in this work, becomes a symbol of agreeable but endless insistence on the rights of all those who cannot speak up for themselves. With violins, violas, trumpets, piano, and drums, she sings out as a lesbian (whose partner expresses much of her lover’s history, demanding that Anthony speak out more loudly than agreeably) for the causes in which she believes.

      Susan B., however, realizes that despite her constant rejections to be represented by the ballot,

that “they listen to me, they always listen to me.” Or as Susan herself realizes, that despite that men “are so selfish,” that they are also “such poor things,” and that “men are gullible, they listen to me.”

      In a strange way, the power with which Susan courted her male and female audiences through her agreeable and polite behavior she knew, all the while, “she was right because she was right.”

      It’s hard to perceive the powerful Felicia Moore as a quiet person, so forceful and magnificent is her singing. But like the male figures of which she sings, she convinces us of her righteous power. And we come to believe in her abilities to convince us, particularly through Stein’s use of minor figures who pass through her life such as Jo the Loiterer (Chance Jonas-O’Toole), Chris the Citizen, and Angel More, who weave into the stewpot of Stein’s arching history a realization of how Anthony was both part of the world in which she lived and highly aware of the future in which women would endlessly have to continue to battle.


      As reviewer Kurt Gottschalk expressed it, quoting from Stein’s lyrics: “They [men] fear women. They fear each other. They fear their neighbor. They fear other countries. And then they hearten themselves in their fear by crowding together and following each other.” I can’t imagine a better expression of the Trump reign.

      Language is at the heart of this marvelous opera. As the noted orator Daniel Webster (William Socolof), in Stein’s and Thomson’s opera expresses the pit of identity, an issue of which Stein, who proclaimed that we simply repeat ourselves, was always interested:

 

                                   My father’s name

 

                                   The pit he digged a pit.

                                   My name cannot be any other.

 

                                   He digged a pit he digged it for his brother.

 

      Digging a pit was what all the men in Susan’s life did, and even after, when women had gained the vote, they choose to cancel the ballots by destroying the ballot boxes. The battle rages still today not only on sexual lines, but regarding partisan politics. The mother of us all has still not yet helped to heal us alas.

      I need to add that in 2000, Felix Bernstein played a child in the New York Opera production with Lauren Flanigan, and he would return from his rehearsals and sing out long passages from the opera so beautifully that I nearly cried. I think that during this time Felix and I truly bonded. I was terribly moved by his singing, and particularly of Stein. His young voice more completely characterized Stein’s Anthony B. than any soprano might.

 

Los Angeles, April 14, 2020

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (April 2020).


Lanie Robertson and Audra McDonald | Lady Day at Emerson's Bar & Grill / 2016

to stop breathing

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lanie Robertson (libretto), songs sung by Billie Holiday sung by Audra McDonald Lady Day at Emerson’s Bar & Grill / 1986, the filmed TV production I watched on July 17, 2020 was from 2016

 

Talk about coincidences, which visit me on a regular basis, on July 17 I had a hankering to finally watch Audra McDonald’s performance of Lady Day at Emerson’s Bar & Grill, a one woman show, with great contributions by Billie Holiday’s pianist and conductor, Jimmy Powers (Shelton Becton), Clayton Craddock on drums and George Farmer on bass. That show, after rattling through dozens of small regional theaters, had its Broadway premiere in 1986 at the Circle in the Square, transformed by director Lonny Price and set designer James Noone by slightly lifting one end of the stage to allow a select few theater patrons to be seen seated while discretely drinking at small tables as they witness the devastating fictional performance only about three months away for Holiday’s death.


     I had so long postponed watching the work for some of the very same reasons that the theater critic of the Los Angeles Times, Charles McNulty observed: “I must confess that I had my qualms. When one recalls Holiday’s sublimely ruined sound at the end of her career, the period in which Lanie Robertson’s concert drama is set, one doesn’t think of McDonald’s soaring, Juilliard-burnished soprano, a gold medal voice still in its athletic prime.”

      What I had entirely forgotten was that “The Day Lady Died”—the title of one of my favorite Frank O’Hara poems who last three stanzas read—

 

                                                       I go on to the bank

   and Miss Stillwagon (first name Linda I once heard)

   doesn’t even look up my balance for once in her life

   and in the GOLDEN GRIFFIN I get a little Verlaine

   for Patsy with drawings by Bonnard although I do

   think of Hesion, trans. Richmond Lattimore or

   Brendan Behan’s new play or Le Balcon or Ne Nègres

   Of Genet, but I don’t, I stick with Verlaine

   After practically going to sleep with qundariness

 

   And for Mike I just stroll into the PARK LANE

   Liquor Store and ask for a bottle of Strega and

   then I go back where I came from to 6th Avenue

   and the tobacconist in the Ziegfeld Theare and

   casually ask for a carton of Gauloises and a carton

   of Picayunes, and a NEW YORK POST wit her face on it

 

   and I am sweating a lot by now and thinking of

   leaning on the john door in the 5 SPOT

   to Mal Waldron and everyone and I stopped breathing

 

  —actually occurred on July 17, 1959.

 

     Well, I didn’t at all have to be skeptical about McDonald’s performance. Not only does she        appear to get most of Holliday’s eccentric lyrical phrasing right, her often drop of the final   syllables, and the intense alternation of alto and soprano vibrato, but she quite stunningly portrays Holiday in the  last days of her life in which the great singer was not only alcoholic—which makes for some highly dramatic dips and near falls, particularly when she attempts to take the few steps down into the audience space—but very much still under the influence of heroin, the marks of which she has attempted to cover over by wearing long white half-gloves that perfectly match what critic Marilyn Stasio described as “a while column gown.”


     McDonald also fragmentarily tells some of her life story through the use of what singers generally describe as banter between numbers—even though, in this case, the talkative interludes slowly begins to outnumber the music. Holiday first explains her distaste of even being in Philadelphia, where Emerson’s exists, relating one of her favorite quips: “I used to tell everybody when I die I don’t care if I go to Heaven or Hell long’s it ain’t in Philly.” Later, she reveals the reason: it was in the city of “brotherly love” that a judge sent her away to prison for possessing drugs, possibly smuggled into her suitcase by her then lover the trumpeter, Joe Guy, who introduced her to heroin. Her jail sentence resulted in her losing the all-important New York license to play in cabarets and clubs, which she explains is why she is now at Emerson’s.

     Of course, at no time in her life did Holiday reveal, particularly s banter between songs, so much detail about her painful life. As Stasio writes:

 

     “Robertson’s script is unrealistically stuffed with just about every known biographical detail about her unhappy life. The mother (“the Duchess’) who go her chubby little girl her first housecleaning job in a whorehouse. The humiliations she endured traveling on club dates through the segregated deep south. The rotten bad luck of falling in love with a no-goodman who got her hooked on heroin and set her up to take the fall on a drug charge. All that, plus the appalling injustice of losing her cabaret card and being banned from performing in New York:


     By the time near the end, so drunken that she has descended to the bar to pour herself her own fresh drink, we are hardly surprised when Holiday somewhat offhandedly describes that as a young girl she was raped. The story that proceeds of her performance of the classic “Strange Fruit,” describes her travels with Artie Shaw through the South in which she was forced to eat in the kitchen and could only enter and exit through it. Having to urinate badly, she attempts to find out where “the colored bathrooms” are, but before she can uncover that secret, she is confronted by a highly bigoted waitress who tells her, in no uncertain terms, that there are no colored bathrooms in this establishment, and that Holiday is most definitely not wanted in this restricted world. Tired of the abuse, Holiday squats and pisses all over the legs and feet of her merciless foe.

 


    Thank heaven, between these extremely dramatic revelations, McDonald still has the opportunity to sing some of Holliday’s greatest numbers, including the bawdy “Pig Foot (and a Bottle of Beer)” and “Tain’t Nobody’s Business If I Do” and “When a Woman Loves a Man,” and—after a break to get a heroin fix—the song she wrote for the Duchess, a somewhat bitter cry after she had been rejected a loan from her mother, “God Bless the Child.” But it is perhaps the song that is most unrepresentable of her general oeuvre, “Strange Fruit,” that literally takes one’s breath away.

      What’s truly fascinating about this work is in the renewed protests of “Black Lives Matter,” Holiday’s comments and life in general summarize so many of the current summaries of blacks wherein this theatrical vehicle, what many might simply describe as a musical entertainment, reiterates the issues of today.

      This Lady Day, filmed for TV at McDonald’s performance at Café Brazil in New Orleans in 2016, reveals the great bisexual singer as quite literally falling apart, yet still able in wise-cracking memories able to make even the sourest patrons giggle and through her singing force everyone to “stop breathing.”

 

Los Angeles, July 20, 2020

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (July 2020).

Index of Entries (by author, composer, lyricist, choreographer, or performer)

Edward Albee | At Home at the Zoo / 2017 Edward Albee | Seascape / 2005 Leroy Anderson, Jean Kerr, Walter Kerr, and Joan Ford | "Who&#...