Search the List

Thursday, March 21, 2024

Contra-Tiempo Urban Latin Dance Theater | joyUS just US / 2020

celebrating the “in-between”

by Douglas Messerli

 

Contra-Tiempo Urban Latin Dance Theater joyUS just US / Ana Maria Alvarez (and cast members) choreography, the production I saw was on January 17, 2020 at the Bram Goldsmith Theater at the Wallis Performance Center in Beverly Hills.

 

Last evening I saw the dance performance choregraphed by Ana Maria Alvarez, along with company members, of a series of Latin dances titled joyUS just US, a company as the work’s title suggests, is about their US identity, despite the disparate backgrounds of their dancers—Isis Avalos, Charlie Dando, Jannet Galdamez, Bianca Medina, Alan Perez, Jasmine Stanley, Dina Toledo, and Dalphe Morantus—who proudly proclaim their citizenships despite our current President’s and other political leader’s abilities inability to comprehend the “in between” nature of our own cultural heritages,

 


    Through a mix of Salsa dancing and other Latin dance traditions, these figures, spin, twirl, twist and turn, and generally perform in a highly physical manner that, at times, is literally gravity-defying as they proclaim their cultural affinities, and their right to be here, in Los Angeles, to be performing in one of the wealthiest spaces in the larger LA community in the middle of Beverly Hills.

    Together they bring song (mostly through Toledo’s soprano renditions) music from the band Las Cafeteras, fusing Afro-Cuban and contemporary dance styles that utterly transform what we generally perceive as modern dance.

     This troupe, displaying dazzlingly colorful tapestries, perform with part of the audience onstage, divided into the two sides of the performance space, as if to include those of us in the audience in their remarkable athletics, and, at one moment encouraging the on-stage audience to participate in their actions.


     Yes, this is a political dance theater, clearly emphasizing their often statemental views about what is happening in contemporary culture; but their simple pleasure in their balletic movements, and their almost impossible-to-be-believed somersaults and sexual interactions can only make us gasp, and help to engage the audience with the sometimes wild and truly joyful actions on the stage. I think even the elderly Wallis opening night audience was truly willing, if they might have been able to, join them on the stage with memories of their rock-and-roll days. 

     If this might not be described as the most elegant of dance concerts, then you wouldn’t enjoy, as I did, this exuberant company. The Contra-Tiempo group is entirely about expressing the excitement of their physical abilities and their bodies, dresses whirling like Turkish dervishes, and male asses displayed as true sexual enticements. Sex, in these dances, is nearly everything. This company does not at all hide what they have to offer, and the audience clearly enjoyed their displays of what dance, open, joyous, proffers.


     Dance, after all, is a sexual act. I once recall a kind of stodgy friend mocking his wife for attending dance concerts: “She just likes to see all those thin male crotches!” I wanted to reply, well don’t we all? The male and female bodies of dance are, in part, what it is all about. How can beautiful bodies move so effortlessly, so beautifully through space? That is the true excitement of dance, isn’t it?

      When I met the great choreographer Paul Taylor at a gay bar in Madison, Wisconsin, I expressed my interest in being a dancer, despite the fact that I had previously had no training. He looked me over, observing that I was, in those days, a cute and thin male figure.  “It’s never too late,” he pontificated. “I began very late myself. You should dance.”

     And I did, taking nightly classes at the Joffrey Ballet Company in New York. I was not a natural. But I so enjoyed those difficult hours at the barre. And, in one wonderful moment, when asked to pirouette, I accomplished it, and was praised—something that rarely happened in such daily exercises.

     The Contra-Tiempo company is a rather wild group, a sort of off-shoot of modern balletic dance; yet their beauty and energy are something that no one who loves the movement of the body might resist.

 

Los Angeles, January 18, 2020

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (January 2020).

Jerome Kern and Oscar Hammerstein II | "Can't Help Lovin' Dat Man of Mine," from Show Boat / 1927

my favorite broadway musical songs: “can’t help lovin’ dat man of mine”

by Douglas Messerli

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwpqtLc3wiM

Composers: Oscar Hammerstein II and Jerome Kern, Show Boat

Performer: Helen Morgan, 1932



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=htv1xyYhO4A

Composers: Oscar Hammerstein II and Jerome Kern, Show Boat

Performer: Judy Garland, 1944

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGOyycNqiWA

Composers: Oscar Hammerstein II and Jerome Kern, Show Boat

Performer: Ava Gardner, 1951 movie version (sung by Annette Warren)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikAXH7fIgT4

Composers: Oscar Hammerstein II and Jerome Kern, Show Boat

Performer: Ella Fitzgerald, Jerome Kern Songbook, 1963

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uWl5vDVc5c

Composers: Oscar Hammerstein II and Jerome Kern, Show Boat

Performer: Barbra Streisand

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJgo9UYT0Ik

Composers: Oscar Hammerstein II and Jerome Kern, Show Boat

Performers: Kiri Te Kanawa and Nathalie Cole, 1997

 

Poor Julie La Verne, a singer on the Cotton Blossom show boat, who is not only told that she can no longer perform on the boat because of being partly black, but soon after loses, Steve, the man, as she explains to Magnolia, daughter of the boat’s owner, Cap’n Andy Hawks, that she can’t help lovin’ until she dies. Is it any wonder that by play’s end she has become a destitute alcoholic?
    In the original 1927 premiere Helen Morgan sang the role which gives two of the show’s best numbers to her, “Can’t Help Lovin’ Dat Man” and “Bill” (not an original song for which Hammerstein retooled the lyrics).

     The better of these two, however, is Hammerstein’s and Kern’s new one, particularly since the work brilliantly sketches a narrative of a woman so desperately in love that she cannot resist what she knows will help to destroy it.

     It’s simply a case of destiny, Hammerstein’s lyrics proclaim, as impossible to change as anything else in nature, including the swim of fish and the flight of birds:

 

Fish got to swim and birds got to fly

I got to love man till I die

Can't help lovin' that man of mine

Tell me he's lazy

Tell me he's slow

Tell me I'm crazy, maybe, I know

Can't help lovin' that man of mine

      

Helen Morgan played Julie again in the 1936 film version, while Ava Gardner sang the song in 1951 film. Since then there have been dozens of interpretations. I’ve chosen just four of them by Judy Garland, Barbra Streisand, Ella Fitzgerald, and an unlikely pairing of Kiri Te Kanawa and Nathalie Cole from 1997.

 

Los Angeles, January 10, 2018


Cole Porter | "Anything Goes" from Anything Goes / 1934

my favorite broadway musical songs: “anything goes”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OhgH-BIDqmw

Composer: Cole Porter

Performer: Cole Porter (restored original), 1934

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wd1w5tn040

Composer; Cole Porter

Performer: Cole Porter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jV_puhanl8

Composer: Cole Porter

Performer: Ethel Merman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iVsD0rltRr8

Composer: Cole Porter

Performer: Patti Lupone, 1988 Tony Award broadcast

 

Perhaps I should begin by admitting that it is difficult even to talk about the plot, written originally by Guy Bolton and P. J. Wodehouse, and revised extensively by the later writing team of Howard Lindsay and Russel Crouse (at the time the director and an agent), of Cole Porter’s Anything Goes.    

      Since the 1934 production, the musical has been reworked numerous times, with major cuts of songs, additional Porter songs added, and the story tweaked

      In a sense, the daffy plot—involving two sets of lovers, mediocre gang members (“Moonface” Martin is only Public Enemy 13) dressed up as clergy members, wealthy parents and a full crew aboard a European-bound voyage of the SS American—hardly matters. It’s the songs in this fairly licentious and libertine work that is the central thing. And what wonderful songs Porter provided, several of which are among my favorites: “I Get a Kick Out of You,” “You’re the Top,” and the memorable “

      In the original version the song was sung by Reno, a former evangelist turned nightclub singer, played by the great Ethel Merman. She has just discovered that she is in love with the wealthy Britisher Evelyn Oakleigh, who is engaged to Hope Harcourt, daughter of a wealthy American family, the Harcourts, who pretend their healthy business is in financial danger to arrange the marriage between the two families.

      Meanwhile Billy, a young Wall Street broker, who has previously met Hope in a taxi, and is desperately interested in the stranger, determines to stow away on the ship with the hopes of courting Hope.



     Sensing wealth and security in Oakleigh, Reno throws over conventions in her determination to marry the stuffy and quite incomprehensible Brit, praising the current American attitudes the permit her to make such an audacious choice.

     Porter was never funnier than in this musical, and his high-spirited salute to the looseness of current mores quite literally leaps off the stage as dancing sailors and sailorettes tap away the song’s contagious repetitions. Porter’s original is necessary in one wants to hear nearly all the lyrics (although others were later added). But it is Merman’s shortened and clearly-iterated version that is the most unforgettable, although Patti Lupone sings it with more subtle shadings; Merman was never truly subtle about anything! The lyrics give just some of this true poem dedicated to naught American’s delights.

 

[RENO]

Times have changed,

And we've often rewound the clock,

Since the Puritans got a shock,

When they landed on Plymouth Rock.

If today,

Any shock they should try to stem,

'Stead of landing on Plymouth Rock,

Plymouth Rock would land on them.

 

In olden days a glimpse of stocking

Was looked on as something shocking,

But now, God knows,

Anything Goes.

 

Good authors too who once knew better words,

Now only use four letter words

Writing prose, Anything Goes.

 

The world has gone mad today

And good's bad today,

And black's white today,

And day's night today,

When most guys today

That women prize today

Are just silly gigolos

 

And though I'm not a great romancer

I know that you're bound to answer

When I propose,

Anything goes

Los Angeles, January 5, 2018

Stephen Sachs | Arrival & Departure / 2018

coming and going

by Douglas Messerli

 

Stephen Sachs Arrival & Departure (based on David Lean’s Brief Encounter) / directed by Stephen Sachs at Los Angeles, The Fountain Theatre / the production I saw was the matinee on Sunday, July 15, 2018

 

Anyone who has read my review of the Noel Coward / David Lean movie of 1945, Brief Encounter (in My Year 2012: Center’s Collapse) will know that am no fan of that melodrama about a young, rather unhappy British housewife who accidentally encounters a handsome and suave man (Trevor Howard), also married and with children, at a train station, which begins a series of “brief encounters” in which they increasingly begin to realize that they might have made the perfect couple as opposed to the flawed relationships in which they now live.

 

     Coward and Lean finally wake up their dreaming characters, forcing them apart and back into the snug corners of their provincial isolationism. It is, in fact, the almost perfect work for these Trump years, as we are all asked to stop seeking anything out of the ordinary and to return to a time that never was.

      Still, I like to be fair to things, particularly to such a much-loved film which has been adulated by most of the British public and admired in the US as well—where several variations of it, in film and on the stage, have recently occurred—and, accordingly, agreed to review this new work.

      Fortunately, Stephen Sachs, working in careful tandem with the Deaf married couple, actors Deanne Bray and Troy Kotsur, using the Coward work as an vague outline transforms the work into a completely American drama which includes a zealously religious husband, Doug (Brian Robert Burns); a racially-mixed romance between a Dunkin’ Donuts Pilipino shop girl, Mya (Jessica Jade Andres) and a handsome black policeman, Russell (Shon Fuller); a confused, cellphone-tapping teenager, Jule (in the production I saw performed by Aurelia Myers); and most importantly, two Deaf people who sign instead of speaking, although Emily apparently has the ability, with the use of special hearing devices to speak in English, while the man she meets in the New York subway, Sam, who works as a American Sign Language instructor, only signs.

 

     While Coward’s work on stage was titled Still Life, Sachs’ version of this work is almost in constant motion, the various patrons of Mya’s donut stand are almost always on the move, marching with the play’s few cast members into patterned maneuvers to represent the busy streets of New York City; Emily’s and Sam’s, presented in ASL passionately expressed conversations with an ever-constant use of hands, arms, and eyes, and emotionality that simply cannot be expressed in the simple home-bound conversations of Emily’s religious and hard-working husband.

      In fact, Bray and Kotsur, emanate love from the first second they meet, falling naturally into a love that, in this case, cannot be unspoken, and is witnessed by all around them in their vibrant movements. Even though she is in her last weeks of Bible study, ready to be baptized into what is clearly a “born-again” sect, anyone with two eyes can see that this is a completely wrong decision. Sachs doesn’t even try to bother to gather a linguistic debate about the issue; having worked for 30 years with the now nationally famous Deaf West actors, beginning at the very theater in which I witnessed this play, the writer/director instinctually knows that these issues are better played out visually than voiced, even though a chorus of fellow commuters played by Adam Burch and Stasha Surdyke do translate the ASL gestures into language for those of us who, I might argue, are hard of seeing.


      Sachs’ work, accordingly, redeems the quiet repressions of Lean’s film by setting everything into the tumult of American life, with all its endless comings and goings, its constant sense of movement. The couple at its center fall increasingly in love in the midst of those greasy, sugar-coated tables serving donuts and coffee, not in a slightly steam-and-smoke filled cottage serving up English tea and other edibles. What was polite in the British version is here gritty, even somewhat violent, particularly when Emily dares to visit Sam on his own territory, in the classroom in which he appears to live. And even that visit terribly excites her, the halls filled with signing young men and women which serve up the truth of her now repressed homelife of devotion and faith.

      Emily, Sam, Jule (Julia) remind one of primary and secondary characters in Thornton Wilder’s Our Town, all figures who seek a world outside of their provincial lives, a play in which Kotsur starred in a major Pasadena Playhouse production.  Is it any wonder that this play’s Emily, after what she knows will be Sam’s and her last meeting is ready to throw herself into the subway tracks? The gentle Russell, the strange romanticist of this play, saves her, so that she might return home to a place she now must realize is not open to her own being.


      She returns for the sake of her daughter, Jule, who has just found out that she has been tricked by a girl pretending to be a young boy about which she has fantasized and poured out her love to on her Twitter for Facebook account. More than ever, this girl needs a strong mother which Emily has now become. But even Doug, who in fear of losing his wife forever had signed up for ASL training, now asks her to be his teacher, a loving act that, no matter how simple it may now seem, cannot be ignored as a pleading for her to stay within the flock.

       Yes, like the major character of Lean’s film, she does return to the fold, the small town provincialism she knows is wrong for her, but here, at least, she is no longer just a housewife. She has become a powerful mother and a teacher, perhaps now able to even stand up against Doug’s religiosity in order to seek out another version of an American Dream, a dream that is always coming and going in American thought and, perhaps, maybe should even be laid to rest. Dreams are dreams, but life is living out who we are and who we have become.

 

Los Angeles, July 16, 2018

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera and Perrformance (July 2018).

Rajiv Joseph | Archduke / 2017

accidents of history

by Douglas Messerli

 

Rajiv Joseph Archduke / Directed by Giovanna Sardelli, Los Angeles, Mark Taper Forum, the performance I saw was on Sunday, May 17, 2017

 

Rajiv Joseph’s newest play, Archduke, is premiering now at Los Angeles’ Mark Taper Forum. Having missed opening night, last week, I saw the play last evening. I’m rather glad I waited. Los Angeles Times reviewer Charles McNaulty complained of some confusion in the play’s second act concerning the arch villain of this piece, Dragutin Dimitrijevic’s (Patrick Page) previous failed coup; and LA Weekly reviewer Deborah Klugman thought that the faces of the performers were poorly lit, yet neither of these problems seemed present in the production I saw. Joseph, notorious for his rewrites while the play is in performance, may have done some tweaking, while lighting designer Lap Chi Chu probably intensified the lights.

 


     The performance I saw went pretty flawlessly, even if the play itself doesn’t quite hit the high metaphysical speculations of Joseph’s Bengal Tiger at the Baghdad Zoo or Guards of the Taj.

      What this new play accomplishes, however, is deep insights into the roots of terrorism, and a look back in history that may help us to understand some of the dilemmas of nationalism we are again facing today.

      The archduke of the title, of course, is Franz Ferdinand, shot with his wife in Saraejevo in 1914 by the Serbian terrorist Gavrilo Princip (Stephen Stocking), an event that immediately set off events that led to World War I and the collapse of the great Austro-Hungarian empire (for the social and literary ramifications of this event, see the essay on Marjorie Perloff’s book, reviewed below).

      Yet Joseph is not as interested in the historical facts—although they thread his tale together throughout—as he is speculating how and why a poor, starving, and quite innocent Serbian boy, along with others, could become involved with a terrorist group that could have such an international impact, the questions one might have as well for the men who flew airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

 

      Gavrilo not only ends up with blood on his hands, but begins the play with his own blood on a handkerchief loaned to him by his examining doctor, Leko (Todd Weeks), who has the sad news of telling the young man that he only as a few months to a year to live, suffering as he is by incurable tuberculosis. It is hard to know whether Gavrilo can really assimilate the news, embarrassed as he is by having soiled the doctor’s linen handkerchief, and fascinated and terrified by the skeleton of a woman hanging in Leko’s office. A virgin, Gavrilo is both shocked to see the insides of a woman before having been to experience a woman’s body, and, in a kind of perverse “dance with death,” he ends up dismembering parts of the skeleton.

       All the clumsy rube perceives is that everything he is has long desired: to eat a real sandwich, to love a woman, or anything else he might have dreamt of will no longer be possible. It is as if he has already died without having the chance to begin living. He contemplates suicide, but is no innocent he cannot even act on that. He is a man who now has no will left.

       Just the man for the Serbian military plotter, who gathers up such TB-ridden men, attempting to forge them into a personal army to revenge what sees as the scourge of Serbia, the wealthy and sophisticated Austro-Hungarian Empire. Threatening the doctor if he does provide the names of those suffering from the disease, Dimitrijevic seeks out his small army.

       Through one of his already converted would-be thugs, Trifko (Ramiz Monsef), Gavrilo and another young sufferer, the charming Nedeljko (Josiah Bania) connect up with Dimitrijevic; their meeting reads a bit like a short Beckett spot:

 

            “Are you the guy? I was supposed to meet up with a guy. 

            “I was just told to meet a guy here.” (something to that effect)

 

       Once Dimitrijevic has his three would-assassins in his presence, he feeds them a full banquet (presided over by his comic peasant cook, Sladjana [Joanne McGee]), pulls down a massive map of middle Europe and explains to them that the reason they are dying is the fault  of the vast orange spot on that map. Like a recruiter for ISIS and other groups today, the military leader takes these meek young men and carefully attempts to mold them into becoming martyrs for a cause they haven’t the intellect to even comprehend.


     But the fact that they may be remembered after their imminent deaths certainly does appeal to them, and before they know it they are being drilled on guns, daggers, and bombs—all which they are thrilled to even have, for the first time, in their hands. Even though their practice session ends in a wound to Gavrilo’s arm—a wound serious enough that Dr. Leko suggests he must immediately be taken to a Belgrade doctor for care, which predictably, Dimitrijevic argues against, once more threatening the only man in the play who seems to really care for these already dying boys.

       But the very promise of a train ride to Sarajevo, their first time on a train, so delights the trio that it is too late to back out—this despite the fact that Sladjana offers Gavrilo a going away gift of a huge sack of roots, meats, and vegetables that are good for any ailment, including constipation and, particularly, if they should have to leave the train before they arrive in Sarajevo. Gavrilo is still too innocent even to perceive her meaning.

       Act II of this historical tragi-comedy consists, at first, of the three peasants simple joy on being in a first-class state-room with real beds, and their excitement (along with Tim Mackabee’s charming set) is almost transformative, turning them almost into the kind of young workers we see in Hello, Dolly! dressed up in their Sunday clothes on their way to New York. Surely, we feel, these kids are not killers.

      And it doesn’t take them long to realize that they don’t want to become murderers, forced to ingest the cyanide pills their leader has given them. Particularly Trifko and Nedeljko seem not up to the task, suggesting they should first eat a hot sandwich or have sex with girls. But Gavrilo, almost a prude and perhaps infected some by Dimitrijevic’s misogyny, imagines still what it might be like as a martyr, a man to be remembered in the history books, when he knows himself to be a forgotten nobody.

      Before they can even come to their senses, the Archduke and his wife rise up in the audience to take the stage, meeting up, quite by accident it seems, with the would-be killer—and history is forever changed!

 

Los Angeles, May 15, 2017

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (May 2017).

Index of Entries (by author, composer, lyricist, choreographer, or performer)

TABLE OF CONTENTS John Adams, Lucinda Childs, and Frank O. Gehry | Available Light / 2015 John Adams and Peter Sellars (based on Old and New...