tearing down bridges
by Douglas Messerli
Arthur Miller A View from the Bridge / Los Angeles, Ahmanson Theatre, the
performance I saw was opening night, September 14, 2016
At least in the production I saw last night at Los Angeles’ Ahmanson
Theatre, famed Dutch director Ivo Van Hove tossed out the family’s dowdy little
apartment stuffed with fussy and falling-apart furniture. The original, in
which five people are pushed into a single flat makes for a kind of
claustrophobia which, at moments, if it generates some body heat, also takes
all the air out the drama.
Van Hove, perceiving the play as a kind of Greek drama, has created
instead a open rectangular space which serves as living room, bed room,
lawyers’ offices and any other space that might be necessary. By creating two
side panels of audience seats on the stage itself, the director has further
created the sensation of a Greek amphitheater, while simultaneously diminishing
the vast space of the stage and allowing for more theater seats. A single
central opening, backed in black further creates a sense of dramatic entry as
the characters come and go. As in the original, Van Hove uses the family lawyer
as the chorus (the metaphorical “bridge” of the play’s title), commenting on
and helping to explain the inner feelings of a man who cannot himself express them.
All of this opens up the play, allowing, as the director as argued, the
playwright’s words to speak out their poetry. But, alas, Miller’s language has
always been rather pedestrian, most of his figures being everyday blokes; and
even though it’s given special privilege here, the character’s utterances feel
as dowdy and diminished, at times, as the overstuffed furniture that one
encounters in most productions of this play.
What exacerbates this feeling is that the play has been cast with very
young talents. And while all are appealingly fresh thespians, few of them have
the heft of the supposedly Sicilian middle-age figures of whom Miller writes.
This is important, in the original, because, except for the two youngest of
this household, all others feel worn out and used (just like their now missing
furniture), with few choices left. Marco (Alex Esola) may intend, after a few
years of working in the US, to return back to Italy and his wife, but we know
he will have lost their best years together and will never recover that hole in
his life.
Eddie (Frederick Weller) is so attracted to his growing-up niece because, like a daughter, she has lit up his otherwise drab working-man’s life. His feelings for her, moreover, have a great deal to do with middle-age angst. Like many a hard worker who suddenly discovers himself in his late 40s, he is terrified of what’s ahead. If the new interloper, Rudolpho (Dave Register) does succeed in carrying her off, Eddie will have little joy left.
Like so many wives of men like Eddie, Beatrice (Andrus Nichols),
although loving, feel as if they have been cast off, and in emotional response,
find it harder and harder to demonstrate that love.
As Catherine, moreover, Catherine Combs
seemed more like a mini-skirted pre-teen than an eighteen-year-old high school
graduate set on becoming a stenographer and secretary. I am sure Van Hove made
this a conscious decision in order to establish the girlish attitude that
innocently crossed sexual lines in her relationship with her uncle. But when
the handsome and charming Rodolpho comes into her life, it is a bit difficult
to even comprehend his attraction to a being who seems to be still a child. The
tall and somewhat lanky Register, moreover, seemed at odds with the diminutive
Combs.
But, finally, it is simply the oppressive obviousness of Miller’s script
that dooms his dark drama. We know, almost from the beginning, where this drama
is going to take us: in tragedy for male lead, Eddie, and disaster for the two
illegal immigrants. The same scenario is being played out in our daily
newspapers even today.
The only surprise in Miller’s rendering of this tale is Eddie’s
confusion over his own sexuality. It is almost as if, since he cannot sexually
“have” Catherine, he will convert the handsome Rodolfo into someone whom he
might love. In his confused macho thinking the very fact that the young Italian
man sings, is easy-going, can quick-design a dress, and dance means that he
must be “odd,” code word for gay. In his mind, he may justify his long kiss on
the lips with Rodolfo as “outing” the man before Catherine in order to save
her; but we know that there’s definitely something else going on there. And it
is the only time when Eddie transforms his ever-present anger into some sort of
passion; and, accordingly, Miller’s sudden revelation still startles even
today.
Of course, after such an unthinkable act, he must destroy everyone
around him, particularly himself, using his own kind of macho—very much present
in the Italian Marco—as a tool of his death. The only hope Miller leaves his
audience is that Rodolfo and Catherine may be spared and will go on to create a
more fluid familial life. But since Rodolfo, as Marco’s brother, may be
implicated in the murder, we cannot even be sure of that.
Los Angeles, September 15, 2016
Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (September 2016).
No comments:
Post a Comment