differential equations
by Douglas Messerli
Lily Blau (developed in
collaboration with Sydney Gallas) The
Missing Pages of Lewis Carroll / Pasadena, California, The Theatre at
Boston Court / the performance I saw was on Sunday, February 8, 2015
Yet none of the theories surrounding Liddell and Dodgson’s relationship
has ever been established, and there appears to be other evidence that he might
have been attracted to Alice’s older sister or that he was courting the girls’
governess at the time of the rupture between him and the Liddells. The break in
social intercourse may even have had more to do with university politics and
his lack of support for Dean Henry Liddell than with his relationship with the
Liddell children. The fact that he gave up photography in the same year of
Alice’s marriage to the cricket-player, Ronald Hargreaves, also may have
nothing at all to do with his relationship to the girl.
Yet clearly, his photographs, if nothing else, reveal a fondness for the
young Liddell daughter, and there are clearly many links, direct and indirect,
that connect the Alice of his stories with the child whom he photographed. Is
it necessarily shocking or perverse to believe that he simply did
The new play by Lily Blau at Pasadena’s The Theatre at Boston Court, in
various ways, explores all the possible alternatives without dismissing any of
them. And that, in turn, is what elevates this work from a simple piece of
gossipy sleuthing to a drama that, inevitably, given what we know to be the
themes of Dodgson’s Lewis Carroll works, transforms it into a mediation on the
uncertainty of all knowledge, particularly within an age in which surety was
seen as a necessity for adult action. The British Victorians were necessarily
confident—even smug—in their acquisitions of colonies, explorations of new
territories, and belief in their societal invincibility.
The
Dodgson of this play clearly is delighted by Alice (Corryn Cummins), and is
desperately in love with her; apparently, he has done nothing to shame
himself—except, of course, in his own imagination. But there, to use
Shakespeare’s old saw, “lies the rub.” Even if he has done nothing wrong, how
can he expect to get away with his sinful thoughts, plagued by his religiosity,
his fear of being “found out” as a social fraud, and his terror—at least in
this telling—of breaking with the conformities of his social position?
Certainly, an Oxford professor might feel perfectly free to express a certain
amount of eccentricities: Dodgson could “play” with photography, tinker with
toys, write up imagined tales, create linguistically tongue-tying poems (which,
oddly enough, The Missing Pages does
not really explore, despite Dodgson’s inability to speak straightforwardly),
even, on occasion, buy his young pupils presents, including a bright blue dress
which he awards Alice so that she might match the girl in his story books; but
there were limits that even differential calculus might demonstrate to him. As
differential equations made clear, for example, “the derivative of the momentum
of a body equals the force applied to the body.” Accordingly, whenever Alice
moved toward him, he moved further into the distance. But what he had not
accounted for is that, as she grew older, Alice might apply a force to his body
that could not equal his resistance.
Indeed, some sources, as I have suggested, hint that his relationship
with the Liddells was ended by the indignant parents when it became clear that
Alice had fallen in love with Dodgson, or, perhaps, after Dodgson determined he
could no longer resist, he asked for her hand in marriage.
Blau’s play, which supposedly occurs on the day when Alice has planned a
visit to Dodgson for one last photograph before she marries Hargreaves, is a
sad one, not only because it calls up all the quandaries of reality and
imagination that, no matter how he actually lived his life, Dodgson surely
faced, but because it finally reveals that his great failure in life was not
doing some dreadful deed, but doing nothing. Alice gently faults him not for
becoming a gray-haired old man, but for refusing to become the rather young and
dashing man who unintentionally (or perhaps intentionally) courted her as a
child, and with whom she fell in love. Like Gustav von Aschenbach in Thomas Mann’s Death in Venice—whose crime is not that
he lusts after the love of another of his own sex, but that he concentrates
that unrealizable love upon the visage of a boy—Dodgson’s failure was not that
he fell in love with a bright young girl, but that he did not reasonably act upon it. If he truly
loved her, mightn’t he have simply waited for a few years to her to have become
a woman and proposed the marriage she also sought? Or did he, her parents
horrified by the implications? Or did he refuse her, after all, because he was
a pedophile who could love only girls of a certain age?
The playwright proffers no answer, but
hints at it through the apparent emptiness of Dodgson’s life. In the end, after
giving up even his hobby, he has little life left as Dodgson, having become a
literary figure, instead, for all times, dying as a nonexistent being (Lewis
Carroll) who expressed sorrow for having written his books, a man who looked
perhaps too deeply into a world which existed, as brilliant as it was, only in
his imagination.
Los Angeles, February 9, 2015
Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance