Search the List

Sunday, October 6, 2024

Peter Hall, Adrian Mitchell, and Richard Peaslee | Animal Farm / 2017

animal uproar

by Douglas Messerli

 

Peter Hall (writer, adapted from George Orwell’s fiction), Adrian Mitchell (lyrics), and Richard Peaslee (music) Animal Farm / performed at Will Geer’s Theatricum Botanicum, Topanga Canyon, Malibu / the production Pablo Capra and I attended was on Saturday, July 8, 2017

 

The last time I encountered George Orwell’s legendary Animal Farm, I believe was in high school, when we were encouraged to read the book as a fable against Communist myths, a very popular work in the Red-scared 1950s. I don’t recall my personal reactions to Orwell’s attempt to correct the Soviet myths of the day—at the same time, I was also secretly reading Albee, Pinter, and Genet— but I certainly would not have imagined that the writer penned the piece, in part, to warn against totalitarianism while hoping to jump-start the socialist concerns that had then been largely abandoned by the West.

    Strangely, seeing it again the other day at the famed Topanga Canyon-idyll, Will Geer’s Theatricum Botanicum, I still found it hard to see it as an encouraging statement to England’s dormant socialists, and a warning for all societies to remain vigilant about even political movements that seem to bring beneficial change. In retrospect, I might even suggest that Orwell’s political ideas, in a strange way, bear a slight resemblance to Mao’s constantly counter-revolutionary positions—but, obviously, without the continual dominance of one or two individuals.


      Peter Hall’s stage adaption of Orwell’s short fiction, with music by Richard Leaslee and lyrics by Adrian Mitchell, captures the essence of the work, while providing a great opportunity to please audiences through the various guises of human kind playing pigs, horses, chickens, lambs, cows, a donkey, cats, dogs, and, occasionally even human beings.

      The Botanicum production, directed by Ellen Geer, has cleverly dressed its human animals in small and large ways, representing ears often with one wire-jigged abstraction and the other in a more representational manner. Pigs noses are characterized by large corks, the bleating sheep hobble about on two legs and two crutches (representing them as slightly unstable beings who stumble through their days), the female chickens sport full boas as they cluck out their egg-laying days, and the two horses feature a full horse mane, while the rest of their body remains very human—particularly in the case of the lean, shirtless actor, Max Lawrence as the hardworking Boxer. The dogs—played by young men forced to move on all fours, dressed in ferocious dog costumes (a difficult task given yesterday’s 97° temperatures)—were absolutely terrifying. I sat in the very front row, and pulled in my legs every time they passed by.


     Today, nearly everyone knows the story of how the animals at Manor Farm, after being continually abused by the farm’s alcoholic owner, rise up in protest, running him off the property and establishing their own “ideal” society. Although all the animals attempt to educate themselves, some, like Boxer, can’t get past his ABCs; others, particularly the pigs—the dreamer-leader, Snowball (Christopher Yarrow), the more insistent Napoleon (Mark Lewis), and the outspoken propagandist of their cause, Squealer (Melora Marshall)—at first lead intelligently, demanding free rights for all animals and proscribing laws that separate them from humans and their corrupt actions. Gradually, over the course of the two acts, however, they begin to starve the others, propagandize their sudden shifts of policy, and ultimately rule their Animal Farm in a way that is even worse than their former human owner.

     If, at first, it is amazing that these uneducated animals can work together to even create a sophisticated mill, slowly after their hard work, they find their crops are being sold off to their human neighbors and their eggs being stolen for the gain of the pigs, who now claim that their animal rights clause has an important stipulation, “some animals are more equal than others.”


      Orwell’s political rhetoric is made more powerful—and, perhaps, palatable to the mixed young and older audience—through the Kurt Weill-like songs by Mitchell and Peaslee. If none of these are precisely memorable, they are sung with such good-natured talent by the ensemble, accompanied by a band consisting of several members, with Daniel Sugimoto as the pianist, that ameliorate the sad abuses of power that destroy the hard-working and always agreeable Boxer, the idealistic pig Snowball, and several generations of the hens whose eggs go missing.

      The beautiful idea of “Animal Farm” gradually is transformed by the ruling pig class back to a Manor, in which the animals have no rights whatsoever, and are seen as nothing but creatures worthy of abuse. In “Why I Write” Orwell recalls seeing a young farm boy driving a carriage as he whipped the horse for varying in any direction. And by the end of his parable, the pigs have been transformed back into humans who have no tolerance anymore for their fellow animal beings.


      Orwell’s works and other such political fables have become popular again in a period when, under the presidency of Donald Trump, any sane person can once again fear not only the delimitations of viewpoints of McCarthy’s 1950s, but that events might even result in a slightly different kind of version of totalitarian rule, when propaganda overrules our country’s laws, and truth is conceived of something so transactional that it no longer has any meaning.

     If this long-lived dream of repertory theater—Geer and his wife founded the theater on his own property in the early 1950s as a refuge for fellow blacklisted artists of the McCarthy Era—at moments seems a bit amateurish, in the end I felt this was a far-more profound theatrical experience than I had had two days earlier at the Pantages’ production of the hit The Book of Mormon. This rustic theater is so beautifully located, that one truly does feel one has entered an amphitheater out of time and place. This play, along with the company’s Shakespeare productions (this season, The Merchant of Venice and A Midsummer Night’s Dream) along with other contemporary productions, runs through October 1, 2017, and I suggest that any interested reader make the trip, as I did with former Topanga Canyon resident Pablo Capra, to rediscover what real theater is all about.    

 

Los Angeles, July 9, 2017

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (July 2017).

Lorraine Hansberry | Les Blancs / 2017

the reluctant warrior

by Douglas Messerli

 

Lorraine Hansberry Les Blancs / Rogue Machine Theatre, performed at The Met Theatre, Los Angeles / the performance Howard Fox and I saw was on Sunday, June 4, 2017

 

Les Blancs (The Whites) was Lorraine Hansberry’s last play, and she left it uncompleted at the time of her early death of cancer at the age of 34. The play was finished by her husband Robert Nemiroff and produced for a short 1-month run on Broadway in 1970, five years after her 1965 death.

      Like many contemporary critics, I knew the history of this play, but having never actually seen a production or even having read it, I presumed it was simply the failure that critics of the original had deemed it. And, yes, the play is rough and even incomplete in some parts, and is polemical throughout—Hansberry was, after all, a playwright of ideas—but how fortunate that Los Angeles’ Rogue Machine Theatre determined to revive it (a production of the play also occurred at London’s The National Theatre last year), for even with its obvious imperfections, I’d argue this is a far more ambitious and energetic piece than her classic realist drama A Raisin in the Sun, which I saw again a few years ago (in 2012) at Culver City’s Kirk Douglas Theatre.


      The well-crafted Raisin perhaps deserves its classic status, but the very rawness and incompleteness of Les Blancs pushes the boundary of theater of its day, and shows its remarkable author as moving away from her realist roots. Referencing the famed Jean Genet play, The Blacks: A Clown Show which premiered in 1959, the years in which Hansberry was writing her work, the author pursues a more expressionist course rather than Genet’s surreal and absurdist perspectives.

      Like The Blacks and the lesser known Aime Cesaire play of 1966, A Season in the Congo, Hansberry’s work is located in Africa, in her case an unnamed African country with similarities to the struggles of black natives in Ghana and Kenya, with its strongest reverberations coming from the 1960 revolution in Congo, where, just as in Hansberry’s play, several white missionaries were slaughtered.

       It is hard for me to even imagine an American playwright of the Kennedy era (he became president, one recalls, in 1961), particularly one suffering from the last stages of cancer, reaching out to African cultural traditions and the battles between blacks who sought to assimilate with white settlers and those determined to free themselves with violence—positions represented by the two extremes in the American black community by Martin Luther King and Malcolm X—in order to create a dialogue between the two visions.

      Certainly as early as A Raisin in the Sun, Beneatha, the Younger daughter, reaches out to embrace all things African. But the intellectual maturity of Hansberry’s debates in this play—and indeed we might define this work as in the Socratic tradition, a series of debates between figures representing its various viewpoints—sprinkled throughout with humor and pathos, lifts this work to a near spiritual level.


      The central struggle of the play is between the white imperialists—who have treated the African native populations as backward children who, they claim, will never come to the wisdom without their help—and the black tribesmen—who unsuccessfully seek justice and fairness in the white legal systems, and, ultimately, demand total freedom. Yet the major verbal battles of this work are between the blacks themselves, particularly between Tshembe Matoseh (Deasean Kevin Terry)—a partially assimilated black man educated in the West, married to a white wife, with a new baby, who has returned only briefly for his tribal-leader father’s funeral—and his totally assimilated brother, Abioseh (Matt Orduña) who has become a priest. Between them is their uneducated younger brother, Eric (Aric Floyd), who divides his time between the white-run mission and his tribal hut where he excessively drinks.

     Neither of the white-educated brothers wants violence, and both hope that the current African ambassador to England, Amos Kumalo, will return to cut new agreements between the tribes and the settlers. Yet, Tshembe is simply too intelligent to see this as a solution, and, although he denies it, he hates the walls whites have created in relationship to his own race, which his profound discussion with a white hanger-on journalist, Charlie Morris (Jason McBeth)—come out to Africa to write a piece about the famed mission—reveals. At issue is the difference between race and racism, between reality and effect:

 

               Tsembe: I said racism is a device that, of itself explains

                              nothing. It is simply a means. An

                              invention to justify the rule of some men

                              over others.

                Charlie: But I agree with you entirely! Race hasn’t

                            a thing to do with it actually.

                 Tsembe: (with pleased perversity) Ah—but it has!

                 Charlie: Oh, come on, Matoseh. Stop playing games!

                 Tsembe: I am not playing games! I am simply saying

                              that a device is a device, but that it also has

                              consequences: once invented it takes on a life,

                              a reality of its own. So, in one century, men

                              invoke the device of religion to cloak their

                              conquests. In another, race. Now in both cases

                              you and I may recognize the fraudulence of

                              the device, but the fact remains that a man who

                              has the sword run through him because he

                              refuses to become a Muslim or a Christian—

                              or who was shot in Zatembe or Mississippi

                              because he is black—is suffering the utter

                              reality of the device. And it is pointless to

                              pretend it doesn’t exist—merely because it

                              is a lie!

 

      The fact that these very same words might be spoken about a great many of the situations today, makes clear just how brilliantly perceptive Hansberry was, and how she was attempting to create a new kind of art that might speak to the truth: an art of music, expression, and dance that nonetheless spoke intensely to thought. Tears almost well up in my eyes when I realize how, if she had lived longer, important her art might have been to the later 1960s, when the same kind of explosions represented in this work came to happen as well in the US, with the murders of so many of our leaders and inner-city riots.

     Throughout Les blancs, the well-meaning Charlie stomps across the floorboards of the crumbling mission, just hoping to talk. But no one, black or white, really wants to “talk,” the words having already all been spoken and having failed. If Charlie wants to “build a bridge” between the cultures, the people in this backwards spot recognize the bridge has never been completed by white culture, only promised, and that “open communication” between the races has become almost meaningless. Charlie’s rightful cries of intellectual prejudice fall on deaf ears.

      Even the renowned mission Charlie intends to write about, as the mission doctor Willy DeKoven (Joel Swetow) reveals, late in the play, is all a lie. Its founder, Dr. Nielsen (a man who has gone across the river, but, like Godot, never shows up for his appointments, having been already murdered by the natives), although devoted to saving lives and converting souls, has, as DeKoven clarifies, devoted the life’s-work to genocide and the status quo. Even as he saves lives, he continually patronizes and even laughs away the demands from the local chief for equality. Despite his insistence that the clapboard shack appearance of his hospital is an attempt to make the natives feel at home, a completely up-to-date white-walled and antiseptic clinic only a few miles away serves the natives far better. The mission itself, accordingly, becomes a kind of device to keep the local natives in bondage. Is it any wonder that most of the tribal leaders have stopped visiting?

      Far worse, what the always-drinking (indeed more alcohol is consumed on this stage than any play in memory since Williams’ The Night of the Iguana) and highly sarcastic DeKoven reveals, is the hypocrisy of Nielsen’s faith. When the good Nielsen discovers that the wife of the local chief, father of the play’s major protagonists, has been raped by the local white army officer, Major George Rice (Bill Brochtrup), he allows her to die in childbirth; the child is saved, despite his desires, by his own wife serving as midwife (beautifully performed by Los Angeles’ noted actor Anne Gee Byrd): the boy is Eric, Tshembe and Abioseh’s unwitting brother.


      And DeKoven, it is hinted, is not only plying Eric with regular bottles of alcohol, but encouraging the boy’s experiments in female sexuality, perhaps even abusing the naive boy.

      No one, in this fallen world, in short, is innocent; and even the young idealist, Tshembe, inevitably, because of his natural-born ability as a leader, is drawn into the conflict. In a touching discussion with Mrs. Nielsen, as she sits beside the casket of her husband, he realizes mid-sentence, with her own urging, that he cannot return to Europe, but must become the “warrior” who will help free his people of white domination.

      The play ends in the tragic murder by Tshembe of his own brother Abioseh, with Mrs. Neilsen—having long ago accepted her fate—being gunned down in the cross-fire. Tshembe too has now given up his ideals, abandoning his desires, like “Orestes…Hamlet…the rest of them,” to simply walk away to “so many things we’d rather be doing.” This is a world of the doomed, a slightly Frankenstein-like world in which the monster must be continually created and recreated.

      The acting of Desean Kevin Terry and Anne Gee Byrd in this production is particularly moving, but everyone involved, including the play’s percussionist (Jelani Blunt) and the beautiful mythic dancer (Shari Gardner) are remarkable.

     For those truly interested in living theater instead of embalmed dramatic classics, I suggest you hurry over to The Rogue Machine (at the Met Theatre) to see this production before it closes on July 3rd.

          

Los Angeles, June 5, 2017

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (June 2017).

Friday, October 4, 2024

Philip Glass (with Shalom Goldman, Robert Israel, Richard Ridell, and Jerome Robbins) | Akhnaten: An Opera in Three Acts

send in the clowns

by Douglas Messerli

 

Philip Glass in association with Shalom Goldman, Robert Israel, Richard Ridell, and Jerome Robbins (libretto), Philip Glass (music) Akhnaten: An Opera in Three Acts / Los Angeles, LAOpera, at the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion / the performance Howard Fox and I saw was a matinee on Sunday, November 13, 2016

 

For me, it’s admittedly hard to know quite what I feel about Philip Glass’s operas, particularly the three signature works, Einstein on the Beach (1976), Satyagrapha (1980), and Akhnaten (1984), all three of which, since visiting the last opera yesterday at the LAOpera company’s production, I have now seen in excellent productions.



      Surely they are all beautiful pageants, with the chordal collection of the composer’s repeated and shifting motifs often creating sounds of shimmering perfection. In all three productions, the sets and costumes were innovative and, in Akhnaten, quite stupendous in their effects. In all the productions I’ve seen, the singers and other figures were superior. Particularly in Akhnaten, countertenor Anthony Roth Costanzo and mezzo-soprano J’Nai Bridges sang quite brilliantly, with the LAOpera Chorus performing at the highest level (despite the unfortunate collapse, in an early scene of the opera, of a chorus member, which required several of her fellow singers to help her off; we can only pray that she was not seriously hurt.).

      Despite the Dorothy Chandler Pavilion’s continued acoustical problems, the LAOpera orchestra, this time under the baton of the young wunderkind conductor/composer Matthew Aucoin, came through well, except in a very few instances where, from my balcony position, we heard more tuba than other instrumentation. The audience, far more diverse than usual and, seemingly, quite sophisticated and eager to enjoy this production, clearly took immediate pleasure in it.

       And yet…in all three works, two of them sung in ancient languages, and the earlier work often singing the language of counting, my companion Howard and I both felt a kind of ennui as the singers moved through space in snail-pace deliberateness, shifting from opera’s more-standard narrative sweep to an opera made up of images closer to tableaux vivants than to normative theater.


      I feel strange to appear to be expressing dissatisfaction with that fact, since I have long expressed my love of just such a narrative technique in the works of Djuna Barnes and in the filmmaking of Sergei Paradjanov, Rainer Werner Fassbinder, and others. Perhaps it’s just not as effective on stage, particularly when accounting a rather exciting tale such as the Egyptian pharaoh Akhnaten’s fascinating short life. In fiction you can combine, as does Barnes, the “stops” in the fiction with a strong narrative overlay, using the temporary tableaux as evidence for the effects of the story. In film, directors such as Paradjanov link their tableaux vivants into a series of narrative events. But in theater such as this, in which there is no true narrative structure, the time-stopped scenes become mere spectacle.

      While Einstein featured the abstract, the mathematical and scientific theories of the thinker, and Satyagrapha dealt with the sometimes equally abstract world of politics, Akhnaten’s is a world of religion, and a radical new religion to boot.*


     Perhaps it is appropriate, at least in the early and late scenes, to bathe the new pharaoh’s, and, later, dead pharaoh’s, experiences in the slow and measured pace of rituals, letting the driving music, most excitingly presented in tympani and brass (there are no violins in this darker-sounding work) create the inner narrative energy. This Egypt is still a dark place of priests who worship dozens of deities, all of whom must be given their due before the new King can be crowned. And it is not accidental that for the first 20 minutes of this opera, the work’s hero is entirely speechless, often while nude—in short, vulnerable and even unprepared for his soon-to-be glorious clothing. Indeed, this King remains partially naked, and therefore, an easy target throughout much of his life.

     It is also clear that the drop-dead love duet between Akhnaten and his wife Nefertiti might not allow for more action than the two walking slowly across stage, each swathed in an endless train of red robes that become intertwined. After all, Tristan and Isolde often stand—at least in most productions—in near motionless scenes to sing their great love duets.


      I can even understand why Akhnaten’s great hymn to the sun, a lovely, quiet piece which Costanzo sings in the very front of the stage—again, while appearing naked, with a gossamer robe to which are appliquĂ©d breasts and, now, a vagina where his real penis once was located—does not require nor even want much movement.

    Yet even later events when Akhnaten sings, quite agitatedly about his vision of a new city to celebrate his sun god, or, when he and his family are coming under attack from the Egyptian citizenry for his insistence on a near-monotheistic worship (scholars now argue, that, at least in the early years, Akhanaten’s world was much more open for individuals to maintain some of their older beliefs), or when the Pharaoh actually comes under attack, being killed in front of his wife, mother, and six daughters do we really need the same slow pace?


       To somewhat entertain us, director Phelim McDermott sends in the clowns—in this case a team of British jugglers who throw balls and other objects, mostly circular—paralleling, of course, the father and mother sun from which Akhnaten argues he has emanated. Yet even their actions are often slowed down as they are forced to slowly crawl across the stage floor and move gradually in and out of the singers. And when they do suddenly spring into action, quite adeptly tossing their balls and clubs through the air, they appear as more of a distraction than an integral element of Glass’s work.

       Strangely, while Glass’s score hardly even lets up in its driving momentum, the fact that he generally prefers to skip stage action or slow it down to such a gradual motion that it appears they are moving in a kind of dream space, he also enervates his characters to such a degree that they appear, themselves, to be unreadable hieroglyphs, and become difficult to comprehend in real life.


        Akhnaten and his world, indeed, are difficult for our time to comprehend, since most of his city, art, and communications were destroyed by his son Tutankhamun and the later pharaoh Horemhab. But it would have been nice, just once, to see these figures behave like real human beings instead of historical ghosts. And, despite the long length of this opera, I’d have given up the jugglers any day just to hear another, more revealing aria by Akhnaten and Nefertti.

        I can only commend LAOpera, however, for staging this stunningly scored work. Perhaps, in the future, we can get a less mannered presentation of it.

 

*I should add that, although the opera seems to give tribute to Akhnaten for his attempt to change his country from polytheism to monotheism, and Freud, in his important study From Moses to Monotheism attempts to connect those changes with Akhnaten’s rule with Moses’ demand that the Hebrews give up their other gods, I am, personally speaking, not so sure I mightn’t prefer the early Egyptian and later Greek and Roman polytheism, which I recount in several of the essays of My Year. These people, at least, lived with a far larger ability to assimilate different religious views. As we know, monotheism most always tended to want to destroy all other religious viewpoints, a history of religious monotheism which remains with us even today, and helped to give rise to groups such as ISIS and even the American Klu Klux Klan.

 

Los Angeles, November 14, 2016

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (November 2016).

Jacques Brel (concept and additional material by Eric Blau and Mort Shuman) | Jacques Brel Is Alive and Well and Living in Paris / 2017

jacques brel is dead and worth resurrecting

by Douglas Messerli

 

Eric Blau and Mort Shuman (conception, lyrics, and additional material, based on the lyrics and commentary of Jacques Brel) Jacques Brel Is Alive and Well and Living in Paris / 1968, revived in 2017 by the Odyssey Theatre Ensemble, Los Angeles / the production Howard Fox and I saw was on Sunday, July 9th, 2017

 

Yesterday afternoon, my companion Howard Fox and I attended an absolutely lovely reprise of the 1968 off-Broadway hit, Jacques Brel Is Alive and Well and Is Living in Paris, when it ran for four years, and eventually was reconstructed into a movie version in 1975.


     Howard and I missed out on those performances, and knew very little of Brel—although Howard vaguely recalls seeing the movie. I had not, and truly didn’t know Brel’s songs except to comprehend that this Belgian composer had been assimilated into the French chanson tradition, and had influenced several international figures (Edith Piaf herself has performed some of his songs, most notably, “Ne mais quitte pas,” a song not in this anthology) and even American singers (The Kingston Trio did a remarkable, and I would argue, completely atypical rendition of his “La Moribond” as “Seasons in the Sun.”). But, basically, I’d never really known his significant contributions. But given this production, that has all changed.

      Indeed, both Howard and I, after hearing this perfectly delightful rendition of some of his major hits, went happily home slightly scratching our heads. What was all the excitement about Brel about? Certainly the audience were of the age that they most certainly might have known of his 1950s and 1960s works, if not of his later cinematic career. Even though we can identify as elderly, we were most definitely on the younger end of the ages of these attendees. I believe we represent a kind intergenerational group, lost in the cusp between the 1950s nostalgic narratives and the transformation into the rock world of Elvis Presley, and, soon after The Beatles and the Rolling Stones. Many of those of of us born immediately after World War II feel slightly trapped between Rosemary Clooney and Janis Joplin, particularly those of us who sought intellectual alternatives to pop culture. I think both Howard and I feel we somehow lost out, because of our serious bent of minds, of the popular culture of our own times. And what I’ve seen in trailers of the Jacques Brel movie, filled with late 1960s, hippyish notions of clowns, balloons, and dancing, half-naked, revenants of the sun, I can’t imagine that I would have truly enjoyed the Brel musical as expressed by Eric Blau and Mort Shuman. My guess is that the 1968 play was also filled with just such topical tropes.


      Fortunately, the current Los Angeles Odyssey Theater production dispels such attic ideas, and the four strong singers, Marc Francoeur, Susan Kohler, Miyuki Miyagi, and Michael Yapujian, work hard to just simply interpret the English lyrics as created by the Blau/Shuman team. But here, it appears, they are also are faced with a problem: the American translators’ shift from the French “chanson” tradition into a kind of American narrative form that is far heavier and denser than the originals. Dan Fisbach’s rather stodgy direction only encourages a kind of plodding story-like presentation of Brel’s far more memorably very personally impassioned songs.

      I say all of this after having left the theater, despite memories of such lovely performances as Susan Kohler’s “My Death” and, even better, her “Marieke” (sung in three languages) and the wonderful last chorus of the 1956 work, “If We Only Have Love,” still with a sense of disappointment. Frankly, many of the songs selected to be included in the Blau/Shuman production are, admittedly, just a bit corny— particularly the opening number “Marathon,” the war-inspired “Statue” (in which a bronzed war-time sculpture comes alive to admit to his sexist behavior to women), “The Bulls” (although admirably performed by the engaging Michael Yapujian), “Funeral Tango” (sung by Marc Francoeur), and, above all, the late musical number “Carousel” (in which the whole cast lamentably engages in a calliope rendition of the popular attraction).



      These songs all appear to be from a generation that has little significance even to the 70-year-olds Howard and I now represent. God knows how younger people (a few of whom had snuck out for a peek) might feel about these musical elephants? I forgave them because of their datedness and loved the cast for their obvious singing talents. We all applauded enthusiastically, and, not to forget, the four musicians—keyboard artist Anthony Lucca, bass player Cyrus Elia, percussionists Conor Molloy and Ryan McDiamid, and guitar player Max Waner—who would have made any production proud of their existence. Some of their jazz intonations while they played, apparently improvised as we all waited for some of the performers caught in heavy Sunday afternoon traffic. We enjoyed it, in short, even if, as we moved home down Olympic Boulevard, I wondered why I still felt so empty, as if I’d swallowed a marshmallow concoction that left me with an unresolved hunger.

      The next morning (today), as I listened to many of the original songs sung by Brel and others on You Tube and other sources I began to see what my problem was. Even the least interesting songs suddenly seemed to reveal to me that what didn’t appeal in the musical, were truly memorable, such as “Amsterdam” (performed at the Odyssey by Marc Francoeur) while Brel which gave it, in his concert-sweaty performance, a sort of red-light urgency; David Bowie’s English version was equally shocking, making you wish to help pull up the sailors’ zippers and send them, after they were safely sated on fish dinners (fish representing women in the French), on their way. “Amsterdam” or, better translated, “In the Port of Amsterdam,” is a red-light number about all the boys (of whatever sexual persuasion) who have sought out sex before drunkenly being shipped back to their endlessly lonely internments upon the sea.    


      The slight love song, “Fanette” of Jacques Brel’s Act II becomes, in Brel’s singing, a truly painful adolescent memory that can never leave the singer whole again. What Susan Kohler competently sang as “My Death” in Brel’s La Mort becomes almost a death march into non-existence, and, sung by Bowie, becomes a terrorizing march into the self-destruction which, alas, he finally faced. Even the eerie “Old Folks,” sung at the Odyssey to an audience basically represented in the mocking English lyrics of folks who seldom wandered out and listened to the tick-tock of the silver clock, seemed, given Brel’s interpretation, a passionate expression of Thomas’ “I Will Not Go Gentle into that Good Night.” 

     It’s now clear, given the passage of time, that Blau and Shuman’s Englishized narrative statements have truly little to do with the originals, and that Brel’s work might have been far better served in the US by an anthology of the hundreds of wonderful adaptations by wonderful American interpreters from Ray Charles, July Collins, John Denver, Nina Simone, Frank Sinatra, Scott Walter, and Andy Williams than in a discrete review of four talented but basically amateur singers.

     I think everyone who loves great music should run to the Odyssey Theatre and hear the versions of the great singer-performer Brel which these well-intentioned performers interpret. It’s a great introduction to the Belgium genius. But then, go home, search out You Tube and other such services and listen, again and again—all day if you have the time. And learn what Brel’s incredible music is truly about. I should add, I immediately posted some of these works to my USTheater, Opera, and Performance site. Go and listen and listen again.

 

Los Angeles, July 10, 2017

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera and Performance (July 2017).





Index of Entries (by author, composer, lyricist, choreographer, or performer)

TABLE OF CONTENTS John Adams, Lucinda Childs, and Frank O. Gehry | Available Light / 2015 John Adams and Alice Goodman | The Death of Klingh...