Search the List

Saturday, July 4, 2026

Benjamin Britten, E. M. Foster, and Eric Crozier | Billy Budd / 1988 [video of English National Opera production]

 darkness, hate, and despair

by Douglas Messerli

 

E. M. Foster and Eric Crozier (libretto, based on the fiction by Herman Melville), Benjamin Britten (composer), Tim Avery (stage director), Barry Gavin (video director) Billy Budd / 1988 [video opera]

 

The English National Opera Orchestra and Chorus production of the opera Billy Budd of 1988, is quite different from the BBC Opera broadcast of 1966 with its open sets and above board actions and officer meetings.


    In Tim Avery’s version of this opera, the emphasis is almost entirely on the law, beginning with the Captain Vere of this production, Philip Langridge not in his library contemplating as in the earlier version in which he muses over the patriarchal laws and restrictions. The books in Tim Avery’s production appear in piles at an angular position as if it were a conveyer belt of the past that he must deal with, a symbolic reading that demand and, of course, justify, the death of anyone who challenges the situation; but it seems heavy-handed given the already lethargic and sorrowful condition of Vere. Langridge appears far leaner and more haggard than Peter Pears. In short, we see both in metaphor and in reality that this Vere has not well survived the years since his decision to destroy Billy. Vere’s justification of his acts here seem entirely empty and meaningless.


      In the work, moreover the books become even more oppressive as the opening chorus members themselves are seen with the books piled before them as we enter the world of their on-board oppression.

      On this ship there is no easy access between the lower deck where the sailors live and the above board world of the officers. They must scurry in an out of narrow slats that lead to the below deck- world much like rats. Even entry and exit is severely delimited in this world.


      The sailors, filmed in darkened and muted hues—this video is in color—are treated even more like bowing slaves than in the earlier BBC production. The oppression, as they sing the “O heave away” song becomes almost like something out of Verdi’s works involving bondage. This ship has none of the superficial legality of fairness that even Vere might have imagined, particularly when we realize they are in bondage not only to the iron batons of Claggart and his kind, but to the books themselves. The symbolism already far outweighs any possible realism in this operatic production. In a sense, Claggart becomes simply an evil personification of the system already at work, whether or not Vere is yet completely aware of it or not. It is the system that kills Billy in the end even more than Claggart or even the refusal to action of Captain Vere.

    Thomas Allen as Billy Budd arrives soon after with the other two impressed sailors, Claggart (Richard von Allan), who in this production looks a bit like how we might conceive death, finding the beautiful founding (a bit prettier than Peter Glossop in the earlier production) to be a “find in a thousand, a beauty, a jewel. The pearl of great price.” Von Allan’s Claggart is immediately ready to admit to his utter attraction to this young man, which, as we know, will be the undoing of Billy.


     But for a moment Billy Budd is “king of the birds, …king of the world!” As he gloriously climbs up the narrow stairs to the foretop singing out of his last boat and comrades, “Farewell to the rights o’ man!” which spells immediate danger to the officers of this ship which interpret such words immediately as being seditious.  

      Like the general quality of the production, however, even Allen’s glorious singing seems to be muted, tapped down before he can even enjoy the moment of his new placement among the hawks.

      Unfortunately, given the darkness and basically uninspired continuation of events. The terrible flogging of the boy leaves him unable to walk, while Claggart sings out “Let him crawl.” The cries of the boy, “I’m done for, I’m done for,” characterize this part of the film, sung in such deep darkness that we can hardly witness the actions.

      It is only with the arrival of the French ship and the failed attempt at attacks when this version of the opera seems to come to life, the color finally returns as all the military brass and the sailors are called on board and action might seem to bring their blood rushing into the bodies once again. In a glorious moment with the full cast on stage this opera suddenly seems to catch fire.

 


     The sailors dream of their own invigoration, they temporary freedom from the world of navel law as chaos seems to cling to the error. But alas, the clouds again hide the foreign ship, the calmness of order and law descends upon them, and even their excited cries are no longer heard as they are forced once again to scurry to the bowels of the ship to be called forward only for punishment and hard labor.


    The implications are that their only joy below is the company of their beautiful companion Billy. Even if they do not share his body, although the writing always opens itself up to the possibility, even his company, his beautiful singing, and simply his caring and benign mien gives there comfort and joy as opposed to the torture of Claggart and the others. In this version of Britten’s masterwork, Claggart does just look like death, he is death, the mirror of all of their fates. It is only natural, accordingly, that he should go after the fairest and purest of them all.

     Claggart’s horrific self-confession of his true vengeance against everything Budd stands for already declares the charming boy’s end:

 

                  “O beauty, o handsomeness, goodness

                   You are surely in my power tonight.

                   Nothing can defend you.”

 


     He knows that he will win, even if it means his own death. This is not just the vengeance of an evil man, this is pure hate speaking, the kind of political hate that underlines this world based on laws that have no longer taken into account just of what he sings: beauty, handsomeness, goodness—and as he might add “fairness and justice.” But, of course, those two elements lie ahead in Vere’s hands, and we quickly recognize what a true coward the imagined “Starry Vere” truly is.

     The weakness—as well as perhaps the strength—of Avery’s production is that nothing in Britten’s roiling score is left to the possibilities the music always seems to promise. The hanging of the beautiful Billy from the yardarm seems determined from the first chord of this dark opera.

     In this world there are no hawks, no stars. Billy is only a naïve dreamer. All is far too dark and determined.

 

Los Angeles, July 3, 2026

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (July 2026)    


Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Lou Reed | Take a Walk on the Wild Side / 2005 [music video directed by Stéphane Sednaoui]

the glam world in which they always imagined themselves

by Douglas Messerli

 

Stéphane Sednaoui (director) Take a Walk on the Wild Side / 2005 [4.10 minutes] [music video]

 

Since it was not common in the early 1970s to promote new songs through videos, professional photographer and video director Stéphane Sednaoui felt it necessary, thankfully, to create a fully realized chic video at 4.10 minute far flashier than even the standard music video, outside of the Bollywood-like celebrations of Lil Nas X and Todrick Hall, to accompany Lou Reed’s Take a Walk on the Wild Side in 2005. Everything about this is quite glamorous, with quick visions of the Warhol studio figures and colorful ad-like spins through the song’s lyrics that make these queers as stunningly gorgeous as they might have wished themselves to be.

     The sound is meticulous, and the varying segments need little explanation since they fully reveal the lyrics.

     While Reed sings the first stanzas about Holly Woodlawn—

 

Holly came from Miami, F.L.A.

Hitch-hiked her way across the U.S.A.

Plucked her eyebrows on the way

Shaved her legs and then he was a she

She says, "Hey babe, take a walk on the wild side"

Said, "Hey honey, take a walk on the wild side”—

 

we see her do precisely that, shave her legs, paint her lips with lipstick, hitchhike into a life “on the wild side.”


Candy came from out on the island

In the backroom, she was everybody's darlin'

But she never lost her head

Even when she was givin' head

She says, "Hey babe, take a walk on the wild side"

Said, "Hey babe, take a walk on the wild side"


     The splashy ad-like portrayals of our celebrities continues with my favorite, Joe Dellesandro.

 

Little Joe never once gave it away

Everybody had to pay and pay

A hustle here and a hustle there

New York City is the place where they said

"Hey babe, take a walk on the wild side"

I said, "Hey Joe, take a walk on the wild side"



     The director provides us with no shots of Joe Campbell, finishing out instead with Jackie Curtis and the three women again.

 

Jackie is just speedin' away

Thought she was James Dean for a day

Then I guess she had to crash

Valium would have helped that bash

She said, "Hey babe, take a walk on the wild side"

I said, "Hey honey, take a walk on the wild side"


    If Reed’s gravely-voiced rendition is not quite in keeping with the slick artistic shots of Sednaoui’s images, they nonetheless reveal what the lyrics are proclaiming: when you take a walk on the wild side you sell your soul to the devil of commercial notions of style and beauty, underneath of which you have little identity left.

     The nameless “colored girls” sing out the true meaninglessness of their existence.

 

Los Angeles, May 30, 2025

Reprinted from My Queer Cinema blog (May 2025).

Jacob Burkhardt | Andy Dances, a Memorial for Andy de Groat, at Judson Church / 2019

expanding time: centers of a whirling world

by Douglas Messerli

 

Jacob Burkhardt (director) Andy Dances, a Memorial for Andy de Groat, at Judson Church September 17, 2019 / 2019

 

During the night of September 20th, 2019, I dreamt a long dream in which I was dancing—at first making miraculous leaps in the manner of Rudolph Nureyev and Mikhail Baryshnikov, but gradually setting into amazing spins, something that I might have associated more with an ice skating dance than with ballet. The spins were startling tight an intense, a bit like a balletic version of the Turkish whirling dervishes, but without their flowing, whirling skirts; I seemed dressed in a more traditional male ballet outfit that represented more a continuously spinning top instead of the mesmerizing, trance-like movements of the Turkish dancers.

    I have long loved dance, and when I was young I studied briefly with the Joffrey Ballet, as I’ve written elsewhere, after being encouraged to take up dance by Paul Taylor, who I met briefly in Madison, Wisconsin in the late 1960s. In New York, I signed up with the Joffrey company as a student, and after weeks and weeks at the barre doing the traditional dance exercise, the males were called to do a pirouette, my strict dance teacher commenting that I had done it quite well, a comment that thrilled me, even if I soon after began to realize that I would never be a significant dancer given the structure of my body and my late-coming to the art.

     While dance, accordingly, continues to thrill me and I attempt to review it as often as I can, I have never since—particularly given the fact that I am now a 72-year-old with a knee replacement—dreamt about me dancing as brilliant as in the images of my dream.

      Perhaps the dance-opera, The Want, directed by Adam Linder, which I’d seen earlier, stimulated something in my brain. In any event, I was delighted, even if more than a little amused, by my sleeping terpsichorean pleasures. By early morning I was comparing my dance moves, in my mind, with my memories of the hero of Paul Auster’s fiction, Mr. Vertigo, wherein the character Walt learns how to fly. I have certainly had many so-called “flying dreams” throughout my life, which simply evince the grace and will-power in which one can remain vertically in the air for very long periods of time. Sometimes in these dreams I just barely hover over the landscape—without flying off into the sky—proving only to myself that I can maintain a slight spin across the long paths home, probably based on a childhood memory of my long walks home each evening from my high school, from the southern end of town to the north where we lived.

     Every morning, after coffee and toilet, in those days, I perused Facebook and then YouTube, first checking the responses to my own postings and then visiting those of others. On this particular morning I suddenly was greeted by what appeared to be a short film on the choreographer and dancer Andy de Groat. I vaguely remembered his name—I had seen Robert Wilson’s Einstein on the Beach, choreographed by Lucinda Childs and de Groat—but otherwise I knew nothing at all about him and his career. If I try to write on dance, I admit I am no dance critic or expert in the field. Literature, film, these are my specialties and wherein my major contributions lie, along with

a long history of art through my husband, art curator Howard N. Fox.

      In those days, before my work of queer film, I rarely clicked on Facebook offerings, but this morning the video on de Groat called out to me, and the synchronicity and coincidence that have long haunted my life as astounded me yet again as I quickly perceived he had died in January 1, 2019 in France, and what I was now witnessing was his memorial at Judson Church that took me down a rabbit hole that I might never have imagined.

      In fact, the very first figure who appeared to welcome the audience was my dear friend from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, Mel Andringa. I momentarily blinked my eyes in disbelief. What was he doing, hosting an event for the dancer in honor of de Groat at Judson Church.

 


     I quickly recognized that their relationship might have harkened back to one of de Groat’s ealy collaborations with Wilson, Deafman Glance (1970), first presented at the University of Iowa where Andriga was then a student/artist/performer. I later brought Andringa and his companion F. John Herbert to perform at Temple University when I was an Assistant Professor there.

     I knew he had long been involved in experimental performance and theater, but now he was discussing personal relationships with so many figures I knew of and whose works I had seen such as Jerome Robbins, Wilson, Christopher Knowles, Deborah Jowitt, and numerous others.  

     The program was more than fascinating:

 

Welcome: Mel Andringa

Andy Dances, excerpt from “Syracuse Sequence” (1975)

with Andy de Groat and Julia Busto; film by Robyn Brentano,

“Get Dancing Poem” and reading by Christopher Knowles, 1975

“Rope Dance,” choreography by Andy de Groat, 1974

Translations Performed by Ritty Ann Burchfield, Charles Dennis, and Buck Wanner,

Reading Text by Deborah Jowitt; read by Sheryl Sutton

Tribute Molissa Fenley

Remarks Robert Wilson on video by Jacob Burckhardt

Tribute Makram Hamdan,

Reading Texts by Andy de Groat; read by Cindy Lubar Bishop, and Robyn Brentano,

“Fan Dance,” choreography by Andy de Groat, (1978) Performed by Martita Abril, Patricia Beaman,

Ritty Ann Burchfield, Satya Celeste, Molissa Fenley, Catherine Galasso,

Patrick Gallagher, John Gutierrez, Makram Hamdan, Meg Harper, K.J. Holmes,

Benjamin Kimitch, Michael O’Rourke, Kathryn Ray, Austin Selden, Viviane Serry,

Vicky Shick, Buck Wanner, and Emily Wassyng.

Remarks by Viviane Serry,

Tribute by Catherine Galasso,

“Willows/Angie’s Waltz” (2018), music: Alan Lloyd; voice: Julius Eastman; playback:

Dizzy Daisy May Schube’t-mahn a.k.a. Andy de Groat; Chamane Simone: Stephanie Bargues; Film: Do Brunet,

Tribute by Frank Conversano,

“Swan Lac,” choreography by Andy de Groat


    Of particular interest were the videos of his “Waiting for Godot Fan Dance,” and his famed “Rope Dance.”

   I hadn’t known previously that de Groat had a romantic relationship with Wilson. Or had I known, moreover, that de Groat was best known for his “spinning” dances, which he did in his own work and in pieces he choregraphed for Wilson and others.

    De Groat himself wrote: “I think of spinning as the base for my dance. There’s something about spinning which just seems kind of present. I can’t explain it.” He goes on to explain it, quite specifically, as the natural movement of dance, tracing it back to several ancient cultures.

     Suddenly this celebration of de Groat’s life seemed to have been recorded particularly for me, and I was slightly frightened by the coincidence of it. I hadn’t even known much about de Groat, let alone that he had recently died. How could I have dancing before I’d truly comprehended it? And why I had come upon this very video the morning after my dream?

    The commentary, videos, and dances were so very stunning, and I suddenly felt I was reliving a world I was never quite involved in previously. In a strange way, it seemed like a slightly out-of-body experience. It was as if my dream called into reality the existence of a figure whom I had been just waiting to meet.


    In my entire life to date (as I revise this essay, now at 79 years of age), I have never once experienced déjà vu, which nearly everyone I know has encountered numerous times. Perhaps my life of synchronicities and coincidence are my version of that experience.

    Finally, I should mention that in 2002, some years previous to this remarkable video, I received a substantial grant from the Foundation for Contemporary Arts, established by John Cage, Jasper Johns, and numerous other artists deeply connected to the Judson Church. In the year I received a grant for poetry, one of my very favorite composers David Lang received a grant, as did Robert Ashley, both icons of avant-garde music and opera for me. I surely met them at that event, but was so in awe I never got to express my appreciation for their art. I never visited the Judson Church, but I remember how furious I was with my beloved friend David Antin when, in one of his more or less unscripted talk pieces he mocked their activities to a class of students at CalArts, and I told him so in no uncertain terms how I felt he was wrong and actually delimiting the imagination of the students.. But then David was a remarkable poet, who despite his wife Eleanor’s fantasies of being a member of the long past world of ballet, knew very little about dance.

    It was a bit confusing to me when I told a straight friend about the piece I had just written and he looked blankly at me, wondering why it might be of gay interest. Beyond the fact that almost all of the figures about which I had written were statedly gay, I was momentarily taken aback. I answered: "Straight people—unless perhaps they are in some religious elevated or drugged-out state of mind—generally do not spin." 

 

Los Angeles, September 21, 2019

Reprinted from World Theater, Opera, and Performance (September 2019).

 

 

Thursday, May 7, 2026

John Latouche | in Howard Pollack The Ballad of John Latouche: An American Lyricist’s Life and Work / 2017

 slipping again

by Douglas Messerli

 

slipping again

by Douglas Messerli

 

Howard Pollack The Ballad of John Latouche: An American Lyricist’s Life and Work (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017)

 

Pollack’s wonderful new biography of lyricist/poet John Latouche is, at times, frustratingly academic in its often-overbearing detail of somewhat insignificant facts and is not the most gloriously written book one has read—but it is so utterly fascinating and revealing that one can forgive most of its flaws.


      First of all, a man who was fairly close friends with most of the major composers of the day, including Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, Vernon Duke, Virgil Thompson, Marc Blitzstein, Duke Ellington, Jerome Moross, Ned Rorem, Harold Arlen, Douglas Moore, John Cage, and so many more; who was a confidante to writers spanning from James Branch Cabell and Tennessee Williams (he introduced the playwright to his to his longtime companion) to Gore Vidal, Carson McCullers, Truman Capote, Frank O’Hara, Jane and Paul Bowles, W. H. Auden—he even briefly shared the famous Brooklyn house where the Bowles’ and Auden lived—William S. Burroughs, John Ashbery, and E. E. Cummings, artists and gallerists such as Larry Rivers and John Bernard Myers, and who was the companion of poet Kenward Elmslie for the last five years of his life; and who  simultaneously was great friends with numerous New York social figures—all of whom, except for a very few, thought him witty, entertaining, and utterly fascinating, even if— they nearly all agreed—he could be completely demanding and self-centric, is simply someone worth documenting.

     Besides all that, Latouche worked with numerous Europeans, helping or attempting to introduce American audiences to figures such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Jean Cocteau, Bertolt Brecht, and numerous lesser figures. You might describe him as simply a seminal figure in the brilliant 1950s artistic, very gay New York world. And Pollack’s significant biography reveals aspects of US cultural history, bringing to the forefront what might otherwise have simply been forgotten. If nothing else, Latouche was a connecting link in the American cultural scene between European traditions, a new attempt to interconnect dance, music, and theater, and the so-called underground gay cabaret New York work that infused new life in the US theater scene throughout the 1950s and into the 1960s.        


                                                                                                                                                                

     More importantly, however, is the fact that the Richmond, Virginia-born writer also contributed significant lyrics to numerous musicals, operas, and other performative pieces, challenging the notions of Broadway musicals and operatic conventions in a way that was quite often frustrating yet totally liberating to his collaborators. Besides his remarkable literary salons, his lyrical compositions for the underground New York cabaret performers, and his tossed-off poetic contributions, Latouche had a rather remarkable theatrical career, including the lyrics for Vernon Duke’s and Lyn Root’s all-black musical (and later film, directed by Vincente Minelli) Cabin in the Sky (with Ethel Waters, Todd Duncan, Rex Ingram, J. Rosamond Johnson, Katherine Dunham and her dancers); Banjo Eyes, also composed by Vernon Duke, as a vehicle for Eddie Cantor;  The Lady Comes Across, music again by Vernon Duke, with book by Dawn Powell, choreography by George Balanchine, with Misha Auer, Gower Champion, and Eugenia Delarova, among many other notable dancers; a musical celebrating the Polish war efforts, Polonaise, with music by Chopin and directed by Stella Adler; Beggar’s Holiday, yet another version of The Beggar’s Opera, this with music by Duke Ellington, with an interracial cast; the well-received Ballet Ballads, with music by Jerome Moross and choreography by Hanya Holm, including 3 of the 4 verbally composed ballets by Latouche: Willie the WeeperRiding Hood Revisted, and the notable The Eccentricities of Davy Crockett, all of which the singers both danced and sang; the award-winning The Golden Apple (again with music by Jerome Moross, and starring Kaye Ballard and Stephen Douglas, which won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle award for Best Musical of 1954); The Vamp (with James Mundy and starring Carol Channing); the successful American opera, The Ballad of Baby Doe, composed by Douglas Moore; as, finally, the lyrics to, at least the first act, for Leonard Bernstein’s and Lillian Hellman’s musical Candide—all before he died in 1956 at the young age of 42! These contributions all from a man who himself thought he was perhaps “lazy” and “desultory,” and who was, in fact, an extreme alcoholic, and who most friends would have described as a person who really was more of a raconteur than a creator. Most of these works, accept The Ballad of Baby Doe, alas were also Broadway failures, why most Americans have never even heard of his name!  How do you begin explaining such a remarkable life? Pollack had clearly a large task in undertaking this biography.

       Perhaps the only thing you can do is return to the lyrics, which my friend Kenward Elmslie asked me to do time again. I wish I’d known of Elmslie’s relationship with Latouche—with my love of all things theater, I did, in fact, know a little (very little I now perceive) of Latouche—and, of course, I wish I had then read more about the lyricist: I’d have immediately done a book! We can never truly forgive ourselves for youthful ignorance.

       But I will take a few of the lyrics to try to redeem myself. Latouche, as Pollack makes quite clear, often with excellent poetic analysis, was truly a brilliant lyricist. Let’s begin with his early lyric from Cabin in the Sky, a song sung by the always remarkable singer/actor Ethel Waters (a song performed by nearly every major singer including Tony Bennett, Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald and numerous others), and which might almost characterize Latouche’s life, who fell in love again and again—a true romantic of the old Southern tradition:

 

Here I go again

I hear those trumpets blow again

All aglow again

Taking a chance on love

Here I slide again

About to take that ride again

Starry eyed again

Taking a chance on love

I thought that cards were a frame-up

I never would try

But Now I'm taking the game up

And the ace of hearts is high

Things are mending now

I see a rainbow blending now

We'll have a happy ending now

Taking a chance on love

 

Here I slip again

About to take that tip again

Got my grip again

Taking a chance on love

Now I prove again

That I can make life move again

In the grove again

Taking a chance on love

I walk around with a horseshoe

In clover I lie

And brother rabbit of course you

Better kiss your foot good-bye

On the ball again

I'm riding for a fall again

I'm gonna give my all again

Taking a chance on love

 

     This combination of Cole Porter and the great American romantic tradition is so remarkable that I think I hardly need delineate the line by line transitions. But it is important to note, that despite the repeat again and again of precisely that word, Latouche uses inner rhyme such as, in the first stanza, “blow”/”aglow”/ “slide”/ “ride”/ “eyed”/ “tired”/ “mending” / “blending,” etc. But it is his metaphors about luck and change that truly stand out in his clever lyrics—the horseshoe, clover, and the rabbit who she even warns ahead of time—that demonstrates her leap into the impossible world of love that is so totally engaging that we share her leap into that new world with joy and pleasure. As many critics have noted, Latouche is a kind of later-day Lorenz Hart, and not just because both were gay, but because of how they used basically gay situations to express heterosexual relationships. One only need compare Latouche’s highly clever lyrics with Hart’s beautiful ballad, “Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered” to recognize their similarities.

 

Seen a lot

I mean I lot

But now I'm like sweet seventeen a lot

Bewitched, bothered and bewildered am I

 

I'll sing to him

Each spring to him

And worship the trousers that cling to him

Bewitched, bothered and bewildered am I

 

     It’s clear just from the lyrics that the poet took chances far too often but did finally find love. And it’s painful to comprehend the difficult transition, just as it is for even the breezy renditions sung by Waters and Fitzgerald. But for me, Judy Garland’s and Barbara Streisand’s slower versions really capture the nature of Latouche’s happy/rather frightening possibilities of new love. Isn’t that what love is all about, wonderfully possible but terribly frightening in the same very moment, which is what his lyrics truly express?

     Or, consider his wonderful song “Lazy Afternoon” from The Golden Apple, where, basically that young Helen seduces Paris:

 

It's a lazy afternoon

And the beetle bugs are zooming

And the tulip trees are blooming

And there's not another human in view,

But us two

It's a lazy afternoon

And the farmer leaves his reaping

In the meadow cows are sleeping

And the speckled trout stop leaping up stream

As we dream

A fat pink cloud hangs over the hill

Unfolding like a rose

If you hold my hand and sit real still,

You can hear the grass as it grows

It's a hazy afternoon

And I know a place that's quiet, except for daisies running riot

And there's no one passing by it to see

Come spend this lazy afternoon with me



This is basically Jerome Moross’ song, with its it curling in melody, undulating into completely sleepy rhythms that simultaneously seduce the figures into a sexual drowsiness; but it’s Latouche’s wonderful lyrics that reconfirm that, with the “zooming” / “blooming” end rhymes surprising us with how the “view” suddenly zooms in the “us two,” seducing the couple to sit “real still” to hear the grass grow and the “daisies running riot.” The “reaping”/ “sleeping”/ is suddenly cut by the “leaping” by the interruption of “up stream,” a place distant from this “hazy afternoon.” And even the daisies’ “riot,” is cut short by the fact that “no one passing by it to see.” The central focus of this lovely, falling melody is, finally, the “me,” Helen who is singing it. Song lyrics don’t usually have such marvelous subtlety. But Latouche always gave them his whole, which makes a basically end-rhyme lyric something more important that what it first seems.

      Even more profound, in many respects are Latoche’s lyrics, highly romantic again, and even suggesting fellow Virginian Edgar Allen Poe, for The Ballad of Baby Doe, these from the opening stanzas of the Moore operatic work “The Willow Song.”

 

Ah!

Willow, where we met together

Willow, when our love was new

Willow, if he once

should be returning

Pray tell him I am weeping too.

 

So far from each other

While the days pass

In their emptiness away.

Oh my love, must it be forever

Never once again

To meet as on that day?

And never rediscover

The way of telling

The way of knowing

All our hearts would say.

 

Gone are the ways of pleasure

Gone are the friends I had of yore

Only the recollection fatal

Of the word that was spoken:

Nevermore.

 

     Here Latouche delays the rhymes, “day” / “say,” “yore” / “nevermore,” while even holding other end rhymes into other stanzas such as “together” / “forever” / “Never” and postponing the other off-rhyme “pleasure.” Everything in this lyric is delayed, attenuated as the couple’s love has been, pushed into a realm that neither of them can any longer comprehend. Rhyme itself is used as a strange device of delay, “away” / “day” / “say.” As Moore’s music arches into high soprano arias, Latouche’s language keeps her weeping down to earth, delayed, and, just perhaps, a bit too knowing and rehearsed, subtly suggesting that the loving Baby Doe is just a bit more knowledgeable about her power over the wealthy Horace than we might suspect. Yet, she remains a kind of innocent here, trying to “rediscover” what “All our hearts would say.” In short, Latouche makes this aria one in which Baby Doe is both wise and innocent, a woman on the make who is, nonetheless very much in love. That balance in a single two stanzas is what I might describe as pure genius.

     I have to admit, finally, by the time I finished Howard Pollack’s long (565 pages, with notes) volume, I had too fallen in love with John Latouche. Wish I’d known him, and I also wish my friend Kenward had told me more about him. But even friends don’t always truly communicate their deepest feelings, do they?

 

Los Angeles, February 17, 2018

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (February 2018).(New York: Oxford University Press, 2017)

 

Pollack’s wonderful new biography of lyricist/poet John Latouche is, at times, frustratingly academic in its often-overbearing detail of somewhat insignificant facts and is not the most gloriously written book one has read—but it is so utterly fascinating and revealing that one can forgive most of its flaws.


      First of all, a man who was fairly close friends with most of the major composers of the day, including Aaron Copland, Leonard Bernstein, Vernon Duke, Virgil Thompson, Marc Blitzstein, Duke Ellington, Jerome Moross, Ned Rorem, Harold Arlen, Douglas Moore, John Cage, and so many more; who was a confidante to writers spanning from James Branch Cabell and Tennessee Williams (he introduced the playwright to his to his longtime companion) to Gore Vidal, Carson McCullers, Truman Capote, Frank O’Hara, Jane and Paul Bowles, W. H. Auden—he even briefly shared the famous Brooklyn house where the Bowles’ and Auden lived—William S. Burroughs, John Ashbery, and E. E. Cummings, artists and gallerists such as Larry Rivers and John Bernard Myers, and who was the companion of poet Kenward Elmslie for the last five years of his life; and who  simultaneously was great friends with numerous New York social figures—all of whom, except for a very few, thought him witty, entertaining, and utterly fascinating, even if— they nearly all agreed—he could be completely demanding and self-centric, is simply someone worth documenting.

     Besides all that, Latouche worked with numerous Europeans, helping or attempting to introduce American audiences to figures such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Jean Cocteau, Bertolt Brecht, and numerous lesser figures. You might describe him as simply a seminal figure in the brilliant 1950s artistic, very gay New York world. And Pollack’s significant biography reveals aspects of US cultural history, bringing to the forefront what might otherwise have simply been forgotten. If nothing else, Latouche was a connecting link in the American cultural scene between European traditions, a new attempt to interconnect dance, music, and theater, and the so-called underground gay cabaret New York work that infused new life in the US theater scene throughout the 1950s and into the 1960s.        


                                                                                                                                                                

     More importantly, however, is the fact that the Richmond, Virginia-born writer also contributed significant lyrics to numerous musicals, operas, and other performative pieces, challenging the notions of Broadway musicals and operatic conventions in a way that was quite often frustrating yet totally liberating to his collaborators. Besides his remarkable literary salons, his lyrical compositions for the underground New York cabaret performers, and his tossed-off poetic contributions, Latouche had a rather remarkable theatrical career, including the lyrics for Vernon Duke’s and Lyn Root’s all-black musical (and later film, directed by Vincente Minelli) Cabin in the Sky (with Ethel Waters, Todd Duncan, Rex Ingram, J. Rosamond Johnson, Katherine Dunham and her dancers); Banjo Eyes, also composed by Vernon Duke, as a vehicle for Eddie Cantor;  The Lady Comes Across, music again by Vernon Duke, with book by Dawn Powell, choreography by George Balanchine, with Misha Auer, Gower Champion, and Eugenia Delarova, among many other notable dancers; a musical celebrating the Polish war efforts, Polonaise, with music by Chopin and directed by Stella Adler; Beggar’s Holiday, yet another version of The Beggar’s Opera, this with music by Duke Ellington, with an interracial cast; the well-received Ballet Ballads, with music by Jerome Moross and choreography by Hanya Holm, including 3 of the 4 verbally composed ballets by Latouche: Willie the WeeperRiding Hood Revisted, and the notable The Eccentricities of Davy Crockett, all of which the singers both danced and sang; the award-winning The Golden Apple (again with music by Jerome Moross, and starring Kaye Ballard and Stephen Douglas, which won the New York Drama Critics’ Circle award for Best Musical of 1954); The Vamp (with James Mundy and starring Carol Channing); the successful American opera, The Ballad of Baby Doe, composed by Douglas Moore; as, finally, the lyrics to, at least the first act, for Leonard Bernstein’s and Lillian Hellman’s musical Candide—all before he died in 1956 at the young age of 42! These contributions all from a man who himself thought he was perhaps “lazy” and “desultory,” and who was, in fact, an extreme alcoholic, and who most friends would have described as a person who really was more of a raconteur than a creator. Most of these works, accept The Ballad of Baby Doe, alas were also Broadway failures, why most Americans have never even heard of his name!  How do you begin explaining such a remarkable life? Pollack had clearly a large task in undertaking this biography.

       Perhaps the only thing you can do is return to the lyrics, which my friend Kenward Elmslie asked me to do time again. I wish I’d known of Elmslie’s relationship with Latouche—with my love of all things theater, I did, in fact, know a little (very little I now perceive) of Latouche—and, of course, I wish I had then read more about the lyricist: I’d have immediately done a book! We can never truly forgive ourselves for youthful ignorance.

       But I will take a few of the lyrics to try to redeem myself. Latouche, as Pollack makes quite clear, often with excellent poetic analysis, was truly a brilliant lyricist. Let’s begin with his early lyric from Cabin in the Sky, a song sung by the always remarkable singer/actor Ethel Waters (a song performed by nearly every major singer including Tony Bennett, Frank Sinatra, Ella Fitzgerald and numerous others), and which might almost characterize Latouche’s life, who fell in love again and again—a true romantic of the old Southern tradition:

 

Here I go again

I hear those trumpets blow again

All aglow again

Taking a chance on love

Here I slide again

About to take that ride again

Starry eyed again

Taking a chance on love

I thought that cards were a frame-up

I never would try

But Now I'm taking the game up

And the ace of hearts is high

Things are mending now

I see a rainbow blending now

We'll have a happy ending now

Taking a chance on love

 

Here I slip again

About to take that tip again

Got my grip again

Taking a chance on love

Now I prove again

That I can make life move again

In the grove again

Taking a chance on love

I walk around with a horseshoe

In clover I lie

And brother rabbit of course you

Better kiss your foot good-bye

On the ball again

I'm riding for a fall again

I'm gonna give my all again

Taking a chance on love

 

     This combination of Cole Porter and the great American romantic tradition is so remarkable that I think I hardly need delineate the line by line transitions. But it is important to note, that despite the repeat again and again of precisely that word, Latouche uses inner rhyme such as, in the first stanza, “blow”/”aglow”/ “slide”/ “ride”/ “eyed”/ “tired”/ “mending” / “blending,” etc. But it is his metaphors about luck and change that truly stand out in his clever lyrics—the horseshoe, clover, and the rabbit who she even warns ahead of time—that demonstrates her leap into the impossible world of love that is so totally engaging that we share her leap into that new world with joy and pleasure. As many critics have noted, Latouche is a kind of later-day Lorenz Hart, and not just because both were gay, but because of how they used basically gay situations to express heterosexual relationships. One only need compare Latouche’s highly clever lyrics with Hart’s beautiful ballad, “Bewitched, Bothered, and Bewildered” to recognize their similarities.

 

Seen a lot

I mean I lot

But now I'm like sweet seventeen a lot

Bewitched, bothered and bewildered am I

 

I'll sing to him

Each spring to him

And worship the trousers that cling to him

Bewitched, bothered and bewildered am I

 

     It’s clear just from the lyrics that the poet took chances far too often but did finally find love. And it’s painful to comprehend the difficult transition, just as it is for even the breezy renditions sung by Waters and Fitzgerald. But for me, Judy Garland’s and Barbara Streisand’s slower versions really capture the nature of Latouche’s happy/rather frightening possibilities of new love. Isn’t that what love is all about, wonderfully possible but terribly frightening in the same very moment, which is what his lyrics truly express?

     Or, consider his wonderful song “Lazy Afternoon” from The Golden Apple, where, basically that young Helen seduces Paris:

 

It's a lazy afternoon

And the beetle bugs are zooming

And the tulip trees are blooming

And there's not another human in view,

But us two

It's a lazy afternoon

And the farmer leaves his reaping

In the meadow cows are sleeping

And the speckled trout stop leaping up stream

As we dream

A fat pink cloud hangs over the hill

Unfolding like a rose

If you hold my hand and sit real still,

You can hear the grass as it grows

It's a hazy afternoon

And I know a place that's quiet, except for daisies running riot

And there's no one passing by it to see

Come spend this lazy afternoon with me



This is basically Jerome Moross’ song, with its it curling in melody, undulating into completely sleepy rhythms that simultaneously seduce the figures into a sexual drowsiness; but it’s Latouche’s wonderful lyrics that reconfirm that, with the “zooming” / “blooming” end rhymes surprising us with how the “view” suddenly zooms in the “us two,” seducing the couple to sit “real still” to hear the grass grow and the “daisies running riot.” The “reaping”/ “sleeping”/ is suddenly cut by the “leaping” by the interruption of “up stream,” a place distant from this “hazy afternoon.” And even the daisies’ “riot,” is cut short by the fact that “no one passing by it to see.” The central focus of this lovely, falling melody is, finally, the “me,” Helen who is singing it. Song lyrics don’t usually have such marvelous subtlety. But Latouche always gave them his whole, which makes a basically end-rhyme lyric something more important that what it first seems.

      Even more profound, in many respects are Latoche’s lyrics, highly romantic again, and even suggesting fellow Virginian Edgar Allen Poe, for The Ballad of Baby Doe, these from the opening stanzas of the Moore operatic work “The Willow Song.”

 

Ah!

Willow, where we met together

Willow, when our love was new

Willow, if he once

should be returning

Pray tell him I am weeping too.

 

So far from each other

While the days pass

In their emptiness away.

Oh my love, must it be forever

Never once again

To meet as on that day?

And never rediscover

The way of telling

The way of knowing

All our hearts would say.

 

Gone are the ways of pleasure

Gone are the friends I had of yore

Only the recollection fatal

Of the word that was spoken:

Nevermore.

 

     Here Latouche delays the rhymes, “day” / “say,” “yore” / “nevermore,” while even holding other end rhymes into other stanzas such as “together” / “forever” / “Never” and postponing the other off-rhyme “pleasure.” Everything in this lyric is delayed, attenuated as the couple’s love has been, pushed into a realm that neither of them can any longer comprehend. Rhyme itself is used as a strange device of delay, “away” / “day” / “say.” As Moore’s music arches into high soprano arias, Latouche’s language keeps her weeping down to earth, delayed, and, just perhaps, a bit too knowing and rehearsed, subtly suggesting that the loving Baby Doe is just a bit more knowledgeable about her power over the wealthy Horace than we might suspect. Yet, she remains a kind of innocent here, trying to “rediscover” what “All our hearts would say.” In short, Latouche makes this aria one in which Baby Doe is both wise and innocent, a woman on the make who is, nonetheless very much in love. That balance in a single two stanzas is what I might describe as pure genius.

     I have to admit, finally, by the time I finished Howard Pollack’s long (565 pages, with notes) volume, I had too fallen in love with John Latouche. Wish I’d known him, and I also wish my friend Kenward had told me more about him. But even friends don’t always truly communicate their deepest feelings, do they?

 

Los Angeles, February 17, 2018

Reprinted from USTheater, Opera, and Performance (February 2018).

Index of Entries (by author, composer, lyricist, choreographer, or performer)

TABLE OF CONTENTS John Adams, Lucinda Childs, and Frank O. Gehry | Available Light / 2015 John Adams and Alice Goodman | The Death of Klingh...