the mirror of truth
by Douglas Messerli
Matei Visniec (author, the script adapted into
English by Jeremy Lawrence), Angajare de
Clovn (Old Clown Wanted) / Los
Angeles, Odyssey Theatre Ensemble, directed by Florinel Fatulescu / the
performance I attended was the matinee on September 23, 2018
The last time I remember loving clowns was as
a child when my father took me and my brother to the Ringling Brothers, Barnum
and Bailey circus in the 1950s in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. There we saw the great
Emmett Kelly and the famed circus clowns piling out of impossibly small cars
and somersaulting over one another with absolute abandonment.
Since then, clowns and mimes have been my least favorite of
entertainers. So perhaps I was not the best critic to determine to review the
play by Romanian playwright Matei Visniec’s production at Los Angeles’ Odyssey
Theatre Ensemble. Yet I love Visniec’s major theatrical influences, Beckett,
Ionesco, and Pinter—the playwright who now lives in France even did his own
version of Beckett’s most famed play, Visniec’s titled The Last Godot—and I love film director Federico Fellini, whose
movie The Clowns initiated the Romanian
playwright’s Angajare de Clovn (Old Clown Wanted).
Unfortunately, in the long space of their own wait for “Godot”—the
simple opening of the door by a producer who might offer one of them the
opportunity of, as Beckett is fond of saying, “going on,” there isn’t much to
do. And despite Visniec’s love of the great Irish-French playwright, he doesn’t
have the linguistic chops to significantly explore their existential position.
Their memories are thin, as they exaggerate, forget, and reenact their past
lives and mutual involvements. Mostly, they compare their different circus
companies and their daring dos. It’s certainly not very scintillating and at
moments is rather boring—at least until Peppino shows up.
Throughout the early part, the two old males, one by one, take out their
skimpy posters and reviews to compare their careers, and pounding their chests
to prove which of them was a better clown. But Peppino pulls out an entire
theatrical flier, arguing, somewhat solipsistically, that she was also an actress
on the stage and, therefore, a far greater performer than a mere clown.
The
issue is a fascinating one, particularly given the facts I’ve recounted above.
Is acting a greater art than pratfalls and silent imitation? We never quite get
the answer, since her proof of her talent lies in dying, the first time rather
inexplicably but convincingly enough that the two males attempt to provide her
some oxygen through Filippo’s “black box” of balloons.
Peppino slowly rises, Chaplin-like cane in hand, to finally enter the
suddenly open doorway to the audition studio, clearly the “winner”—if there
might ever be one, of the oldest clown competition. And we perceive her entry
into that space also defines her death.
The moral, I presume, is that acting does best comic mimicry. Yet, isn’t
that precisely what she has done, played dead, like the La Dame aux Camélias, surely not a sign of great talent, despite
the tears it aroused in the eyes of hundreds of audience members in the late 19th-century.
In
the end, this is a kind of sly play in its investigation of the differences
between buffoonery, mimicry, and true acting. And along the way, there were a
great many moments of simple fun. But I am not sure that I might define this as
a profound theatrical event.
Los Angeles, September 24, 2018
Reprinted in USTheater, Opera, and Performance (September 2018).
No comments:
Post a Comment